Teams

C4 Willow Oaks Blackwood

2022 Richmond Combo Mixed · Richmond Combo Mixed 7.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.83 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-11-19vs C9 Return of the MAC HuangLost 01
L#1 DoublesLaura Granger / Keyur Shah vs Allen Huang / Mary Church2-6, 0-6
2022-11-06vs C3 Acac Davis CC CrushersWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrian Ford / Laura Granger vs Brian Adams / Lisa Aaron6-4, 6-2
2022-10-30vs C1 Raintree CharyWon 10
W#1 DoublesTerence Blackwood / Sallie Mayer vs Gary Wills / Pam Koch6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2022-10-12vs C2 Westwood CecilLost 01
L#1 DoublesLaura Granger / Philip Strunk vs Grant Slegowski / Megan Alwine0-6, 3-6
2022-09-18vs C9 Return of the MAC HuangWon 10
W#3 DoublesJohn Port / Sallie Mayer vs Billy Michael / Melody Morton6-4, 6-3
2022-09-11vs C7 CCV ReifsniderWon 20
W#2 DoublesTerence Blackwood / Sallie Mayer vs Kristin Mullins / Brent Winn6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLaura Granger / Brian Ford vs Patrick Toohers / Anne Robertson Starke6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Mixed 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Jessica Morton
published
3.92
Laura Granger
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.92
Peyton Curdts
published
3.73
Sharon Fuller
published
3.36
Sallie Mayer
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.34
Greg Loomis
published 3.5
3.33
Terence Blackwood
published
3.33
Philip Strunk
published
3.26
Keyur Shah
published
3.13
John Port
published
3.09
Brian Ford
published 3.5
3.02
Jeffrey Begin
published
Lee Turlington
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jessica Morton
8W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%55%45%
3.98
4.5
Laura Granger
131W–99L career · 4 lines in 2022
72%28%<1%
3.92
Peyton Curdts
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.92
Sharon Fuller
9W–6L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Sallie Mayer
85W–101L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Greg Loomis
9W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
Terence Blackwood
22W–22L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.33
Philip Strunk
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
91%9%<1%
3.33
Keyur Shah
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
John Port
6W–11L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Brian Ford
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.09
Jeffrey Begin
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
44%55%<1%
3.02
Lee Turlington
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.