Teams

FK Greene

2024 Marion Trilevel 18 & Over · 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-09-08vs FK LongLost 01
L#1 DoublesPatricia James / Victoria McClintock vs Marisa Rodriguez / Lucy Kaul4-6, 3-6
2024-09-08vs Skyview EnnettLost 01
L#2 DoublesRhonda Sangster / Kayleen Quinn vs Helen Sweeney / Irma Buttermore6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRhonda Sangster / Kayleen Quinn vs Nicole Millsaps / Lauren Stevenson2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesPatricia James / Victoria McClintock vs Kristin Milbrandt / Abigail Dellovade2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Tanner Watts
published
3.72
Dana Pine
published 4
3.41
Judy Hoops
published
3.32
Catherine Sersen
published 3.5
3.06
Janet Greene
published
3.03
Victoria McClintock
published
2.93
Patricia James
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.88
Michelle Broder
published
Kayleen Quinn
published
Nancy Little
published
Pamela Plumlee
published
Rhonda Sangster
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patricia James + Janet Greene314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tanner Watts
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.89
4
Dana Pine
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
Judy Hoops
16W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.41
3.5
Catherine Sersen
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
Janet Greene
26W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%33%67%
3.06
Victoria McClintock
10W–11L career · no lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
3.03
Patricia James
98W–75L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
2.93
Michelle Broder
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
80%20%<1%
2.88
Kayleen Quinn
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nancy Little
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Pamela Plumlee
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rhonda Sangster
125W–102L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.