Teams

GLTF/GOLDMAN TC 40AM4.0B

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Men's 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-03-10vs BAY CLUB SF TENNIS 40AM4.0CSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBijan Ahmadzadeh / Rodolphe Cassand vs Nicholas Lynch / Sean Moore2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesChristopher Screnci / Chris Rosenlund vs Eric Debbane / Lyman Chao6-1, 6-3
2025-03-06vs GOLDEN GATE TC/GOLDMAN TC 40AM4.0ALost 02
L#2 DoublesSteve Nugent / Andrew Hall vs Nadim Hossain / Carl Oman4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRodolphe Cassand / James Wang vs Johannes Kratz / Niraj Javeri6-7, 4-6
2025-01-23vs BAY CLUB SF TENNIS 40AM4.0CWon 21
W#1 SinglesWalter Cheng vs Bobby Carter6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRodolphe Cassand / Christopher Screnci vs Charles Spelman / John Huster2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJason Goodrick / Aaron Walz vs Andrew Ho / Eric Debbane6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2025-01-16vs GOLDEN GATE TC/GOLDMAN TC 40AM4.0ALost 02
L#2 DoublesWalter Cheng / William Cary vs Nadim Hossain / Stanley Tan4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSteve Nugent / Chris Rosenlund vs Chris Oconnor / Niraj Javeri4-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Andrew Hall
published 4
3.70
Aaron Walz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Walter Cheng
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.58
Chris Rosenlund
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.48
Jason Goodrick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Jay Wu
published
3.39
Rodolphe Cassand
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.32
Olivier Notteghem
published
3.16
Dave Jensen
published 3.5
3.00
Jonathan Feldman
published
Steve Nugent
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
William Cary
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Hall + Jay Wu303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrew Hall
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Aaron Walz
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
Walter Cheng
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
Chris Rosenlund
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.58
Jason Goodrick
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
55%45%<1%
3.48
Jay Wu
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Rodolphe Cassand
10W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Olivier Notteghem
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Dave Jensen
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
3.16
Jonathan Feldman
8W–11L career · no lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.00
Steve Nugent
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
William Cary
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.