Teams

Motter-Jungclaus

2025 Combo 18 & Over- Knoxville · 6.5 Women Combo Doubles

10 players · average NTRP 2.75 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-09-21vs Gardner/KnoxvilleLost 02
L#1 DoublesCaroline McGinnis / Rachel Burks vs Amy Saty / Katie Buehler0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLisha Venable / Sue Mather vs Emily Elison / Sarah Henderson0-6, 1-6
2025-09-14vs Gomes-SpurginLost 02
L#1 DoublesJanet Jungclaus / Caroline McGinnis vs Emily Mcclenagan / Karli Campbell0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRachel Burks / Darcy Hoffman vs Katherine Michalik / Sarah Michalik1-6, 3-6
2025-08-24vs MauteBucknerLost 03
L#1 DoublesShireen Hemani / Hailey Motter vs Meredith Buckner / Eda Pratt3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCaroline McGinnis / Darcy Hoffman vs Chelsea Maute / Natalie Berning4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSue Mather / Janet Jungclaus vs Anna Monarch / Suzanne Carswell5-7, 0-6
2025-08-10vs Huffman/KnoxvilleLost 02
L#1 DoublesSammy Ivens / Sue Mather vs Wendi Arnold / Anessa Savici5-7, 2-4
L#2 DoublesCaroline McGinnis / Rachel Burks vs Cindi Mooney / Elsa Roland0-6, 2-6
2025-08-03vs TilsonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCaroline McGinnis / Janet Jungclaus vs Ginger Arthur / Cassidy Hunsucker0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesHailey Motter / Kimberly Wunderlich vs Nikki Tilson / Megan Witherington6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women Combo Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.53 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Hailey Motter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.59
Sue Mather
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.58
Shireen Hemani
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.51
Darcy Hoffman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.36
Lisha Venable
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.33
Rachel Burks
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.24
Caroline McGinnis
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
Janet Jungclaus
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Kimberly Wunderlich
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sammy Ivens
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisha Venable + Darcy Hoffman033 matchesnot enough data
Caroline McGinnis + Rachel Burks033 matchesnot enough data
Shireen Hemani + Darcy Hoffman123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Hailey Motter
8W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07
Sue Mather
3W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
2.59
Shireen Hemani
8W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
28%72%<1%
2.58
3
Darcy Hoffman
16W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
2.51
Lisha Venable
2W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
85%15%<1%
2.36
Rachel Burks
7W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%88%12%
2.33
2.5
Caroline McGinnis
1W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.24
Janet Jungclaus
3W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kimberly Wunderlich
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sammy Ivens
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.