Teams

Nair/Memphis

2025 Tri-Level 18 & Over - Memphis · 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 2.80 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-06-23vs Johnson/MemphisSplit 11
W#2 DoublesPing Zhou / Monica Gallimore vs Houstyn Loosier / MacKenzie Fowler4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAlecia Monett / Kelsey Ray vs Tammy Robertson / Roni Terry0-6, 2-6
2025-06-17vs Noldon/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnn Yackel / Erica Swatzyna vs Tracy Pope / Melinda Hoehn7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Evans / Jennifer Larkin vs Marjorie Noldon / Lauryn Yackel6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKelsey Ray / Christine Anderson vs Carol Haynes / Keneisha Fountain4-6, 6-0, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Erica Swatzyna
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
3.08
Ping Zhou
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Ann Yackel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.85
Kristin Russum
published
2.75
Deepa Nair
published 3
2.68
Tarshian Moon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.56
Monica Gallimore
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.44
Susan Patrone
published
2.44
Jennifer Larkin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.42
Melissa Taras
published
2.30
Alecia Monett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.22
Cristina Guibao
published 2.5
2.10
Beth Price
published 2.5
1.75
Kelsey Ray
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maricela Robles-Murguia + Ann Yackel4259% games+7.7% vs expected
Deepa Nair + Ann Yackel6059% games+6.0% vs expected
Erica Swatzyna + Ann Yackel3246% games−1.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Erica Swatzyna
5W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Maricela Robles-Murguia
24W–17L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.14
Ping Zhou
23W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.08
3.5
Ann Yackel
23W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
Kristin Russum
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Deepa Nair
22W–16L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Tarshian Moon
31W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
2.68
Monica Gallimore
6W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
34%66%<1%
2.56
Susan Patrone
18W–31L career · no lines in 2025
0%65%35%
2.44
Jennifer Larkin
7W–33L career · 1 line in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.44
Melissa Taras
5W–15L career · no lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
2.42
2.5
Alecia Monett
6W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
0%92%8%
2.30
2.5
Cristina Guibao
12W–10L career · no lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.22
2.5
Beth Price
13W–11L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Kelsey Ray
1W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.75

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.