Teams

PW.Reinicker

2022 CTRL Summer Singles 18 & Over · Summer Singles 18 & Over 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-08-18vs TOC.HollettWon 10
W#1 SinglesMelinda Reinicker vs Tracy Lowrance6-2, 6-3
2022-08-01vs TOC.AroraWon 10
W#3 SinglesMelinda Reinicker vs Shylaja Karimanye6-0, 6-0
2022-07-14vs MD.FlowerLost 01
L#1 SinglesMelinda Reinicker vs Brigette Flower4-6, 0-6
2022-06-09vs LOCH.ShawWon 20
W#1 SinglesErin Horne vs Saba Badalamenti6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesMelinda Reinicker vs Mary Jo Ford6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Summer Singles 18 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Melinda Reinicker
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.02
Kimberly Hall
published
2.86
Emily Haverstick
published 3
2.71
Erin Horne
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.69
Kristin Comer
published
2.45
Sarah O'Grady
published
Kristen Kruszewski
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Melinda Reinicker
98W–59L career · 4 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
Kimberly Hall
6W–11L career · no lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
3.02
3
Emily Haverstick
7W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Erin Horne
55W–52L career · 1 line in 2022
5%93%1%
2.71
Kristin Comer
8W–13L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
Sarah O'Grady
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
2.45
Kristen Kruszewski
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.