Teams

IE-CCCC-Kay

2024 Mixed 55 & Over · Mixed 55 7.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.38 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-11-16vs SoCal/Hoak/Mxd55&Over7.0Split 11
L#1 DoublesScott Soren / Heidi Brun vs Kennett Lai / Lo Ling Lozoya4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSesilie Kay / Peter Bliss vs Amy Garrett / Don Hoak6-3, 6-4
2024-11-10vs SoCal/Hoak/Mxd55&Over7.0Split 11
L#1 DoublesHeidi Brun / Scott Soren vs Ronald Bone / Gayle Vanderlinden3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesPeter Bliss / Sesilie Kay vs Don Hoak / Jean Kielhold4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-10-20vs IE-Redlands-YoungWon 10
W#2 DoublesScott Soren / Heidi Brun vs Douglas Moreno / Lisa Contreras6-2, 6-1
2024-10-12vs IE-TCC-CardonaLost 01
L#3 DoublesSesilie Kay / Vincent Olague vs Mark Mendoza / Eva Revesz1-6, 4-6
2024-09-29vs IE-Redlands-YoungSplit 11
W#1 DoublesScott Soren / Heidi Brun vs Douglas Moreno / Denise Stewart7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDavid Bradvica / Sesilie Kay vs David Jorgenson / Cesaria Vazquez4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed 55 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Julie Perkins
published
3.68
Scott Soren
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.40
Janet Giles
published
3.22
Heidi Brun
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.74
Annette Flores
published 3
2.69
Sesilie Kay
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Peter Bliss
published
Phil Taylor
published
Sara Aschmann
published
Steve Richardson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peter Bliss + Sara Aschmann4162% gamesnot enough data
Heidi Brun + Scott Soren3254% gamesnot enough data
Sesilie Kay + Scott Soren303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Perkins
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Scott Soren
82W–44L career · 4 lines in 2024
9%89%1%
3.68
Janet Giles
18W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Heidi Brun
139W–89L career · 4 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
3
Annette Flores
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Sesilie Kay
133W–145L career · 4 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.69
Peter Bliss
13W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Phil Taylor
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sara Aschmann
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Steve Richardson
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.