Teams

CCRC - Cassell

2025 CSRATA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Fall '24 · Women 3.5 Day

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 3.5 Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Christine Lewis
published 3.5
3.47
Nancy Akers
published
3.45
Lindsey Folley
published
3.40
Elizabeth Beman
published
3.36
Leah Cassell
published
3.30
Taylor Atwood
published
3.27
Sara Haddow- Liebel
published
3.24
Vickie Phillips
published
3.22
Terri Finch
published
3.08
Tania Matos
published
2.97
Alison Hodges
published 3
2.77
Missy Fitzgerald
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Haddow- Liebel + Christine Lewis5258% games+9.7% vs expected
Elizabeth Beman + Lindsey Folley16856% games+5.2% vs expected
Sara Haddow- Liebel + Vickie Phillips7353% games+4.2% vs expected
Leah Cassell + Nancy Akers13858% games−1.6% vs expected
Terri Finch + Taylor Atwood11754% games−2.8% vs expected
Vickie Phillips + Christine Lewis123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christine Lewis
40W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.50
Nancy Akers
21W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.47
Lindsey Folley
19W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.45
Elizabeth Beman
18W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
3.40
Leah Cassell
13W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
Taylor Atwood
16W–7L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Sara Haddow- Liebel
29W–20L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Vickie Phillips
36W–22L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Terri Finch
24W–17L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.22
Tania Matos
18W–42L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
3
Alison Hodges
16W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
2.97
Missy Fitzgerald
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.