Teams

Hauswirth - Ball Busters

2025 Howard Tri-Level · Howard Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-08-14vs Tetrault - Invisible sTRIngsWon 20
W#2 DoublesNichole Hauswirth / Chrissy Adair vs Meaghan Williams / Katherine Fluharty6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesStephanie Heinrichs / Beth Anne Feldman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-07-30vs Chung - Triple ThreatWon 10
W#3 DoublesStephanie Heinrichs / Julie Cabaniss vs Christine Twele / Elizabeth McLeod7-5, 6-1
2025-07-17vs String Theory (Quinlan)Won 10
W#3 DoublesJulie Cabaniss / Rebecca Clark vs Mihaela Pertea / Jessica Myers6-4, 6-3
2025-06-26vs Tetrault - Invisible sTRIngsLost 02
L#2 DoublesStephanie Heinrichs / Julie Edwards vs Meaghan Williams / Katherine Fluharty2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMeghan Leimenstoll / Julie Cabaniss vs Allison Mathis / Jennifer Sinkule1-6, 5-7
2025-06-20vs Phan - Kicking AcesLost 01
L#3 DoublesRebecca Clark / Julie Cabaniss vs Jillian Kingwood / Tammara Peyton4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-06-03vs Chung - Triple ThreatSplit 11
W#2 DoublesChrissy Adair / Nichole Hauswirth vs Jessica Thompson / Sandy Friedman6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJulie Cabaniss / Stephanie Heinrichs vs Elizabeth McLeod / Julie Chrisco Andrews6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2025-05-29vs LaMoure - TrianglesWon 10
W#3 DoublesJulie Cabaniss / Rebecca Clark vs Anne McKissick / Kathleen Stevens6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Madison Simmons
published
3.97
Nichole Hauswirth
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.87
Eloise Grose
published 4
3.68
Kathy Crowley
published
3.43
Chrissy Adair
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Marina Goncharuk
published
2.89
Julie Cabaniss
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Stephanie Heinrichs
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.83
Rebecca Clark
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chrissy Adair + Nichole Hauswirth26173% games+10.0% vs expected
Rebecca Clark + Julie Cabaniss7449% games−0.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Madison Simmons
13W–17L career · no lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
4.00
4
Nichole Hauswirth
124W–46L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.97
4
Eloise Grose
14W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.87
Kathy Crowley
15W–34L career · no lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.68
3.5
Chrissy Adair
115W–37L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.43
Marina Goncharuk
21W–8L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.21
3
Julie Cabaniss
126W–124L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Stephanie Heinrichs
107W–115L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
Rebecca Clark
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.83

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.