Teams

JClarke/Dukes (Queens)

2023 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 8.5 Men - Tues PM

10 players · average NTRP 4.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-09-26vs JWolf/Eagan (WSRC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesBharath Bhaskar / Tim Chu vs Martin Iles / Robert Major7-6, 7-6
2023-09-12vs DJones (Raintree)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBharath Bhaskar / Jose Paez vs Steve Chatt / Brad VanHoy3-6, 4-6
2023-09-11vs CGardner/AZelepouga (Queens)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesRaj Voleti / Duane Johnson vs Christopher Gardner / Anatoly Zelepouga3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDarnaye Black / Shivam Desai vs Nate Siens / Eric Winn4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-09-05Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDarnaye Black / Shivam Desai vs Alex Kiser / Avery Nelson6-7, 4-6
2023-08-22vs BSmith/JNichols (Queens)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesShivam Desai / Bharath Bhaskar vs Ravi Mujumdar / Michael Dellorfano0-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-08-15vs RVarn (Palisades)Won 20
W#1 DoublesDarnaye Black / Danny Garcia vs Kevin Green / Keenan Ahern6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRaj Voleti / Shivam Desai vs Mathias Schmidt / Pavel Studenovsky1-6, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 8.5 Men - Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.01 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Raj Voleti
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.21
Jared Dukes
published
4.19
Andrew Schulz
published 4.5
4.09
Thian Neirel
published
4.07
Shivam Desai
published
4.05
Darnaye Black
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.93
Bharath Bhaskar
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.72
Joseph Clarke
published
3.54
Tim Chu
published
Kevin Siebs
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Raj Voleti + Bharath Bhaskar9555% games+0.8% vs expected
Bharath Bhaskar + Darnaye Black314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Raj Voleti
213W–48L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
4.31
Jared Dukes
12W–5L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
4.21
4.5
Andrew Schulz
11W–13L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
4.19
Thian Neirel
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
4.09
Shivam Desai
3W–19L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
4.07
4.5
Darnaye Black
116W–60L career · 3 lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
4.05
4
Bharath Bhaskar
149W–60L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.93
Joseph Clarke
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%5%95%
3.72
Tim Chu
9W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%38%62%
3.54
Kevin Siebs
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.