Teams

Cherokee Town Club (Christi Veach)*

USTA Atlanta Summer - 40 & Over Weekday Women · 3.0 Women (Lisa Ray)

21 players · average NTRP 2.94 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 Women (Lisa Ray) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Ellen Melcher
published
3.08
Mary Stratton
published
3.00
Carrie Brune
published 3
3.00
Lauren Schlossberg
published
2.99
Susan Rocchini
published
2.95
Sheila Hare
published
2.91
Katie Gardiner
published
2.87
Deborah King
published 3
2.85
Amber Jenkins
published 3
2.85
Amber Almond
published 3
2.83
Dana Giacone
published 3
2.79
Sarah Rogers
published
2.77
Robin Bowen
published
2.71
Sarah O'Brien
published
2.71
Christi Veach
published 3
2.66
Rebecca Wallis
published
2.59
Erin Graner
published
2.53
Karol Lawrence
published
2.52
Annette Hays
published 3
Cecelia Ratcliffe
published 2.5
Kristine Nardelli
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christi Veach + Ellen Melcher5061% games+12.2% vs expected
Amber Almond + Sheila Hare11456% games+7.7% vs expected
Amber Jenkins + Carrie Brune4255% games+6.5% vs expected
Erin Graner + Karol Lawrence3449% games+4.5% vs expected
Christi Veach + Robin Bowen81247% games+2.6% vs expected
Amber Almond + Ellen Melcher5449% games−4.1% vs expected
Deborah King + Sarah O'Brien224 matchesnot enough data
Robin Bowen + Mary Stratton134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ellen Melcher
24W–20L career · no lines in 2025
22%77%<1%
3.11
Mary Stratton
19W–18L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
3
Carrie Brune
14W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
Lauren Schlossberg
6W–23L career · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.00
Susan Rocchini
15W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.99
Sheila Hare
36W–38L career · no lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
2.95
Katie Gardiner
8W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%26%
2.91
3
Deborah King
26W–35L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Amber Jenkins
14W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Amber Almond
21W–21L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.85
3
Dana Giacone
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.83
Sarah Rogers
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Robin Bowen
18W–32L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Sarah O'Brien
15W–19L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Christi Veach
28W–31L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Rebecca Wallis
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
2.66
Erin Graner
8W–14L career · no lines in 2025
26%73%<1%
2.59
Karol Lawrence
3W–11L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
2.53
3
Annette Hays
2W–9L career · type S · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
2.52
2.5
Cecelia Ratcliffe
3W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristine Nardelli
0W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.