Teams

Utah/Rose/18&Over2.5W

2025 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 2.5W PM

8 players · average NTRP 2.92 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-06-02vs Sports Mall-Team FunWon 10
W#2 DoublesChristina Jones / Annie Richie vs Karen Weyman / Rebecca Rynders6-1, 6-2
W#1 DoublesKendall Aguilar / Annie Richie vs Heather Wissler / Tiffany Rodriguez6-4, 6-2
2025-05-15vs Salt Lake Tennis-WilliamsLost 01
L#1 DoublesElise Buchman / Amanda Robinson vs Mari Bickmore / Ana Totland4-6, 3-6
2025-04-30vs Liberty Park-En FuegoWon 10
W#2 DoublesAnnie Richie / Kendall Aguilar vs Debbie Beckstrom / Maddison Weber6-1, 6-2
2025-04-21vs Sports Mall-Team FunWon 10
W#2 DoublesElise Buchman / Amanda Robinson vs Lindsay Roth / Olivia Moreton6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 DoublesKendall Aguilar / Annie Richie vs Kimberly Chytraus / Cristina Cook6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAmanda Robinson / Elise Buchman vs Marilee Garff / Angela Fletcher6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-04-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesKatie Rose / Annie Richie vs Brittany Pope / Kristin Rocke6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 2.5W PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Utah/Rose/18&Over2.5W7117717163

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.41 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Annie Richie
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.74
Mariam Azin
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.52
Kylene Brooks
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.45
Blake Bohe
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.41
Kendall Aguilar
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.21
Amanda Robinson
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 2.5
2.10
Elise Buchman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Katie Rose
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kendall Aguilar + Annie Richie8264% games+5.9% vs expected
Amanda Robinson + Elise Buchman3544% games−7.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Annie Richie
22W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Mariam Azin
46W–55L career · 7 lines in 2025
4%92%3%
2.74
3
Kylene Brooks
33W–19L career · 7 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
2.52
3
Blake Bohe
23W–34L career · 6 lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.45
3
Kendall Aguilar
46W–41L career · 5 lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
2.41
2.5
Amanda Robinson
24W–46L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.21
Elise Buchman
6W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Katie Rose
38W–45L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.