Teams

GR-Taylor (18s 4.5M SP)

2026 Neuse River Adult 18 & Over League · 4.5 Men 18 & over

14 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-03vs BW-Shue (18s 4.5M SP)Won 31
L#1 DoublesQuincy Edwards / Graham Toler vs Ronan Boyle / David Osborne3-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesDylan Costello vs Tom Shoopman6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesWinfield Warren / Thomas Hall vs Earl Henry Hostetler / Jacob Hostetler7-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesRobby Taylor / Matt Turbeville vs Andrew Shue / Mark Gerhart6-1, 6-3
2026-04-28vs BW-Shue (18s 4.5M SP)Won 41
W#1 DoublesDylan Costello / Stephen Reams vs David Osborne / Samuel Hylton6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesGraham Toler vs Sviatoslav Archava2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAlex Renfrow / Maxwell Gregson vs Earl Henry Hostetler / Hank Hostetler6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesWinfield Warren vs Ronan Boyle7-5, 7-5
W#3 DoublesRobby Taylor / Richard Bansittidet vs Fabian Wayar / Mark Gerhart7-5, 6-1
2026-04-25vs BW-Shue (18s 4.5M SP)Split 22
L#1 DoublesCourtney Harrell / Quincy Edwards vs Sviatoslav Archava / David Osborne4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCalvin Yurick vs Timothy Dickson6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMatt Turbeville / Tyler Haislip vs Mark Gerhart / Samuel Hylton0-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesAlex Renfrow vs Tom Shoopman6-4, 6-2
2026-04-14vs BW-Shue (18s 4.5M SP)Won 21
W#1 DoublesStephen Reams / Courtney Harrell vs Hank Hostetler / Jacob Hostetler6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesWinfield Warren vs Sviatoslav Archava6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMaxwell Gregson / Graham Toler vs Fabian Wayar / Mark Gerhart6-0, 6-3
2026-04-07vs BW-Shue (18s 4.5M SP)Won 41
W#1 DoublesRobby Taylor / Alex Renfrow vs David Osborne / Thomas Stroud6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesWinfield Warren vs Sviatoslav Archava4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesQuincy Edwards / Dylan Costello vs Jacob Hostetler / Hank Hostetler6-0, 6-2
L#2 SinglesThomas Hall vs Ronan Boyle3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesGraham Toler / Maxwell Gregson vs Fabian Wayar / Mark Gerhart6-4, 6-1
2026-03-14vs BW-Shue (18s 4.5M SP)Won 21
L#1 DoublesRobby Taylor / Alex Renfrow vs David Osborne / Thomas Stroud4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesCalvin Yurick vs Tom Shoopman7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesQuincy Edwards / Dylan Costello vs Timothy Dickson / Andrew Shue6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.5 Men 18 & over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GR-Taylor (18s 4.5M SP)6022818198
2BW-Shue (18s 4.5M SP)0682247328

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.90 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.35
Alex Renfrow
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.32
Courtney Harrell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Calvin Yurick
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.16
Winfield Warren
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.07
Robby Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.04
Dylan Costello
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.93
Maxwell Gregson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.90
Quincy Edwards
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.81
Stephen Reams
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Graham Toler
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.46
Matt Turbeville
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.28
Tyler Haislip
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Richard Bansittidet
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Thomas Hall
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Quincy Edwards + Dylan Costello404 matchesnot enough data
Quincy Edwards + Courtney Harrell134 matchesnot enough data
Dylan Costello + Robby Taylor404 matchesnot enough data
Stephen Reams + Courtney Harrell224 matchesnot enough data
Alex Renfrow + Dylan Costello303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alex Renfrow
8W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
4.35
4.5
Courtney Harrell
11W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
4.32
4.5
Calvin Yurick
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Winfield Warren
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
4.16
Robby Taylor
15W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
4.07
Dylan Costello
18W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
4.04
Maxwell Gregson
23W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.93
Quincy Edwards
10W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.90
Stephen Reams
6W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.81
Graham Toler
26W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.58
Matt Turbeville
6W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.46
Tyler Haislip
6W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Richard Bansittidet
9W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Thomas Hall
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.