← Teams

N OR-SHC-Thompson

2023 Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Nancy Garlock
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
—
Linda Mertz
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
—
Maureen Mader
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.16
Carmen Warda
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
—
Kathleen Francis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results8 ties
2023-05-11Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesNancy Garlock / Marcie Price vs Jill Derry / Joy Nunn6-0, 7-5
L#3 DoublesBetty Trubo / Kathleen Francis vs Sue Edmonds / Louanne Fuller6-2, 6-1
2023-05-04Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesMaureen Mader / Elizabeth Evans vs Judy van Gasse / Lynn Moore6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesBrooke Thompson / Linda Mertz vs Laura Greenberg / Anna Boyarshinova2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-04-27Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesNancy Garlock / Marcie Price vs Lisa Schaller / Marilyn von Bergen6-2, 6-1
2023-04-20Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesKathy Schaub / Maureen Mader vs Patricia Morrison / Linda Underwood6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesNancy Garlock / Marcie Price vs Tuni Stecker / Holly Guntermann6-2, 6-1
2023-04-14Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesKathy Schaub / Linda Mertz vs Judy Orlandini / Gale Schmidt6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2023-04-06Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesNancy Garlock / Marcie Price vs Erin Thole / Pauline Reilly6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJanet Collier / Maureen Mader vs Madelene Decosta / Patricia Sturr6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesCarmen Warda / Elizabeth Evans vs Janet Hostetler / Raymonde Narlow6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-04-06Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesLinda Mertz / Linda Clayton vs Ann Cassin / Gina Ariosa6-3, 6-3
2023-03-30Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesMaureen Mader / Debra Wilkins vs Patti Dybdahl / Robin Burak6-2, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Nancy Garlock
29W–30L career · type A
not enough data
—
3.5
Linda Mertz
19W–20L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Maureen Mader
20W–12L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Carmen Warda
68W–35L career
5%95%0%
3.16
3
Kathleen Francis
16W–12L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.