Teams

Smartaces

Fall Adult 18 & Over WeekDAY (Non-Adv) · Womens 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.38 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-06vs Sweet Shots 3.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMegan Rothwell / Julie Waidelich vs Kathy Wilkinson / Catherine Ladd6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-10-30vs Balcones Love All!Split 11
W#2 DoublesBrannon Andrews / Julie Waidelich vs Noriko Mizuno / Janice Lehman6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAnagha Vasudevan / Jane Fuchs vs Sabra Fuller / Michelle Pearcy5-7, 4-6
2025-10-23vs No Strings AttachedWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrannon Andrews / Julie Waidelich vs Stacy Kelly Girton / Laurie McCartney4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-10-16vs Knock the Fuzz OffWon 21
L#1 DoublesBrannon Andrews / Andrea Martin vs Melissa Rabeaux / Mikalah Gaither2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJulie Waidelich / Jessie Rupert vs Jennifer Egelsee / Melissa Hall6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJane Fuchs / Anagha Vasudevan vs Beth Bradfield / Li Lian Tan6-2, 6-2
2025-10-09vs Not My FaultWon 10
W#2 DoublesBrannon Andrews / Jessie Rupert vs Jan Rockwell / Vicky Wells6-4, 6-2
2025-10-02vs Berry Twisted 3.5 WeekdayWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrannon Andrews / Andrea Martin vs Cindy Bittenbinder / Ann Strozewski6-4, 6-3
2025-09-18vs Sweet Shots 3.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesJulie Waidelich / Jane Fuchs vs Theresa Sharpe / Lisa Tucker6-2, 6-2
2025-09-11vs Balcones Love All!Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBrannon Andrews / Cathy Douglas vs Jordan Preddy / Laura Kelley2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Womens 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Andrea Martin
published 3.5
3.49
Maria Nino-Gil
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.42
Julie Waidelich
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.38
Brannon Andrews
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Jessie Rupert
published
3.31
Megan Rothwell
published
3.21
Cathy Douglas
published 3.5
3.21
Jane Fuchs
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Keri Hutton
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.93
Sarah Railey
published
2.90
Anagha Vasudevan
published 3
2.88
Roz Johnson
published
2.86
Megan Little
published
2.82
Jennifer Isenberg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Heather Bauer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Martin + Megan Rothwell7063% games+12.7% vs expected
Brannon Andrews + Andrea Martin8163% games+8.2% vs expected
Keri Hutton + Heather Bauer2446% games+5.8% vs expected
Jessie Rupert + Megan Rothwell10257% games+5.5% vs expected
Brannon Andrews + Cathy Douglas6357% games+5.3% vs expected
Andrea Martin + Cathy Douglas9463% games+3.9% vs expected
Andrea Martin + Jessie Rupert3557% games+3.5% vs expected
Brannon Andrews + Megan Rothwell5849% games+1.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Andrea Martin
78W–41L career · no lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.50
Maria Nino-Gil
87W–76L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%53%47%
3.49
Julie Waidelich
29W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.42
3.5
Brannon Andrews
52W–29L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
Jessie Rupert
46W–23L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Megan Rothwell
57W–68L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Cathy Douglas
52W–38L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
Jane Fuchs
7W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Keri Hutton
28W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.03
Sarah Railey
38W–20L career · no lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Anagha Vasudevan
64W–53L career · no lines in 2026
<1%76%23%
2.90
Roz Johnson
26W–22L career · no lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88
Megan Little
27W–22L career · no lines in 2026
1%84%15%
2.86
Jennifer Isenberg
53W–35L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Heather Bauer
16W–20L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.