Teams

Yadkin/HPCC/18+3.5 Day

2024 Yadkin Valley Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women-Wednesday (day)

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-08vs Yadkin/Hollan-Bryan/OT/18+3.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBrenda Varner / Niddy Corrias vs Marina Davis / Carla Hoots3-6, 4-6
2024-04-30Won 10
W#3 DoublesNiddy Corrias / Brenda Varner vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-04-22vs Yadkin/Haggard/18+3.5 DayLost 01
L#3 DoublesNiddy Corrias / Brenda Varner vs Betty Haggard / Kathryn Campbell6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-04-03Won 10
W#2 DoublesNiddy Corrias / Brenda Varner vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-03-20Won 10
W#3 DoublesBrenda Varner / Niddy Corrias vs Arla Cahill / Anna Fisher6-0, 6-0
2024-03-13vs Yadkin/FCC/18+3.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesBrenda Varner / Niddy Corrias vs Kerry McFaddin / Jamie Forsey7-6, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women-Wednesday (day) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Sarah Howell
published
3.61
Morgan Qubein
published
3.27
Courtney Penley
published 4
3.27
Niddy Corrias
published
3.17
Kelly Penley
published
2.91
Brenda Varner
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
Cackie Marsh
published 3
Debbie Shane
published 3
2.68
Jill Phelps
published
Kathryn Harrell
published
Marilyn Nowell
published
Rachel Mohorn
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marilyn Nowell + Kathryn Harrell4171% games+10.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Howell
32W–18L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
Morgan Qubein
22W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%22%78%
3.61
4
Courtney Penley
4W–12L career · no lines in 2024
95%5%<1%
3.27
Niddy Corrias
11W–16L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Kelly Penley
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
3
Brenda Varner
137W–87L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Cackie Marsh
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Debbie Shane
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jill Phelps
2W–29L career · no lines in 2024
99%1%<1%
2.68
Kathryn Harrell
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Marilyn Nowell
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rachel Mohorn
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.