Teams

MEA RED

2023 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-17vs MEA NAVYLost 12
L#1 DoublesMimi Goodman / Michelle Hill vs Jacquie Prescott / Susan Boennighausen4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesCharity Sevian vs Cynthia Shick0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLisa Varga / Kim Obert vs Marianne Martin / Claire Lochridge6-3, 6-4
2023-07-10vs NJ BLUELost 01
L#1 DoublesMichelle Hill / Charity Sevian vs Dorelle Peters / Leslie Tancredo4-6, 2-6
2023-07-03vs CVTA BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesAudrey Irwin / Mimi Goodman vs Shaun Howe / Lisa Ritchie0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Varga / Michelle Hill vs Michelle Gleason / Jenny Pergola4-6, 0-6
2023-06-26vs BRMST GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesMimi Goodman / Paula King vs Elizabeth Wilson / Shauna O'Brien6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAmanda Paulson / Lisa Varga vs Melissa Rawsky / Leslie Gaiser2-6, 5-7
2023-06-19vs TTA-E BLUELost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Varga / Audrey Irwin vs Lisa Shaver / Kristen Womer4-6, 3-6
2023-06-12vs RCC REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMimi Goodman / Audrey Irwin vs Jennifer Gorrell / Karen Coyle1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesKelly McGahan / Kim Obert vs Tierney Luoma / Anne Elliott7-6, 6-3
2023-06-05vs NJ GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesLisa Varga / Kelly McGahan vs Kristin Walters / Christine Loehr1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPaula King / Mimi Goodman vs Laura Kelly / Lisa Kellogg5-7, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.69
Kelly McGahan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.68
Charity Sevian
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.63
Amanda Wember
published 3
2.60
Mimi Goodman
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.54
Lisa Varga
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Kim Obert
published
Paula King
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly McGahan + Lisa Varga3347% gamesnot enough data
Paula King + Mimi Goodman044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Kelly McGahan
34W–57L career · 2 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Charity Sevian
15W–21L career · 2 lines in 2023
9%89%1%
2.68
3
Amanda Wember
6W–12L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
2.63
3
Mimi Goodman
16W–29L career · 5 lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
2.60
3
Lisa Varga
25W–31L career · 5 lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
2.54
Kim Obert
5W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Paula King
8W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.