Teams

LPKU-Kumar/PAC

2022 Lake Combo Doubles 55 & Over · Men 8.5 Thurs PM

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-13vs LMFerrero/PACLost 02
L#1 DoublesMichael di Benedictis / Rolfe Schnur vs Tom McElhenny / Michael Brady3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBill Leonard / Bill Parrish vs Todd Sommers / George Harris3-6, 3-6
2022-10-06vs LKHaynes-Westport/CSD 55sLost 01
L#1 DoublesVincent Altamura / Rolfe Schnur vs Phil Payne / Kevin Hawkins0-6, 2-6
2022-09-29vs LMRO-Robson/CSDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesVincent Altamura / Bill Parrish vs Steve Brinkman / George Jackson6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMichael di Benedictis / Bill Leonard vs Charles Quinn / Jeremy Cowper3-6, 3-6
2022-09-22vs LMFerrero/PACLost 12
W#1 DoublesBill Leonard / Michael di Benedictis vs Todd Sommers / Brent Foushee6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesVincent Altamura / Rolfe Schnur vs Jim Illing / Jack Horowitz3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesPradeep Kumar / Bill Parrish vs Samuel Kopchick / Mauro Coruzzi2-6, 3-6
2022-09-18vs LMRO-Robson/CSDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesVincent Altamura / William Cooper vs Charles Quinn / Brian Cudney6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBrian Lynch / Bill Parrish vs Robert Eric Nielsen / Ken Peppercorn3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-09-16vs LKHaynes-Westport/CSD 55sLost 01
L#1 DoublesVincent Altamura / Bill Parrish vs Phil Payne / Corey Cornacchio3-6, 2-6
2022-08-25vs LKHaynes-Westport/CSD 55sLost 01
L#1 DoublesVincent Altamura / William Hirata vs Phil Payne / Thomas Griffin0-6, 0-6
2022-08-18vs LMRO-Robson/CSDLost 01
L#1 DoublesPradeep Kumar / Bill Parrish vs Michael Flanagan / Jeremy Cowper4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 8.5 Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Bill Leonard
published 4
3.84
Bill Parrish
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.76
Vincent Altamura
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.56
Michael di Benedictis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.55
Gary Latimer
published 4
3.54
William Cooper
published
3.40
Will Robinson
published
Rolfe Schnur
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bill Leonard
11W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
3.93
4
Bill Parrish
69W–52L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Vincent Altamura
103W–81L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Michael di Benedictis
69W–70L career · 3 lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.56
4
Gary Latimer
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.55
William Cooper
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.54
Will Robinson
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
78%22%<1%
3.40
Rolfe Schnur
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.