Teams

Junior/LR/OC

2025 Combo 18 & Over 5.5, 7.5, 9.5 · 7.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.67 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-09-23vs Brewer/LR/RebLost 12
L#1 DoublesTish Pace / Elizabeth Jara vs Ana Bridges / Brooke Smith2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCheryl Johnson / Susan Gammill vs Michele Brewer / Natasha Vincent1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesWhitney Cathcart / Debra Nathaniel vs Christi Headlee / Kyla Bryant4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-09-11vs OATES/RVILLE/BPLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnita Junior / Lori Smith vs Amie Denton / Ellie Karvoski3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesWhitney Cathcart / Elizabeth Jara vs Megan Longing / Amber Talley5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesStephanie Blair / Cheryl Johnson vs Jennifer Simmons / Natalie Griffin6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2025-08-18vs Manasco/CahillLost 03
L#1 DoublesTish Pace / Elizabeth Jara vs Marisa Cahill / Pauline Godoy6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCheryl Johnson / Chyrel Henry vs Carley Glenn / LoisAnn Hale3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSusan Altrui / Lori Smith vs Tiffany Garretson / MacKenzie Simon1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Chyrel Henry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Whitney Cathcart
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.32
Susan Gammill
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Elizabeth Jara
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Tish Pace
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Debra Nathaniel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Anita Junior
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Susan Altrui
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Stephanie Blair
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debra Nathaniel + Chyrel Henry123 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Blair + Chyrel Henry123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chyrel Henry
11W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
Whitney Cathcart
11W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.55
Susan Gammill
18W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Elizabeth Jara
7W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Tish Pace
6W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
3.31
3.5
Debra Nathaniel
12W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Anita Junior
30W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
Susan Altrui
8W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.99
Stephanie Blair
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.