Teams

Meridian NETC

2025 Combo Doubles 18&Over-PB · Men 7.5

7 players · average NTRP 3.83 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-10-19vs Sumrall 7.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesBruce Clopton / James Hootman vs Taylor Tamberg / Alfonso Preziosi0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAndrew Dayton / Michael Hodge vs Richard Hernandez / Jonathan Sims6-3, 6-4
2025-10-12vs Sumrall 7.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesAndrew Dayton / Michael Hodge vs Wilson Bounds / Richard Hernandez6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJames Hootman / D'Quante Evans vs James Sumrall / Jon Goldman1-6, 2-6
2025-09-28vs Sumrall 7.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAndrew Dayton / Michael Hodge vs Reilly Miller / Chris Caves6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBruce Clopton / D'Quante Evans vs Taylor Tamberg / James Sumrall5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPete Mazzella / James Hootman vs Terence Payne / Chad Carmichael1-6, 0-6
2025-09-07vs Sumrall 7.5Lost 12
W#1 DoublesAndrew Dayton / Michael Hodge vs Hunter Holcomb / James Sumrall4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBruce Clopton / D'Quante Evans vs Brian Long / Richard Hernandez5-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJames Hootman / Michael van Veckhoven vs Zachary Christ / Wilson Bounds3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Andrew Dayton
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Bruce Clopton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.26
D'Quante Evans
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
James Hootman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Michael Hodge
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Michael van Veckhoven
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Pete Mazzella
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Hodge + Andrew Dayton314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrew Dayton
3W–1L career · type S · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Bruce Clopton
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
D'Quante Evans
2W–5L career · type T · 3 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
James Hootman
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Hodge
5W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael van Veckhoven
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Pete Mazzella
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.