Teams

Joe

Tri-Level -Spring · Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.60 / ALASKA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-04-08vs Allen CWon 21
W#1 DoublesJay Green / Phu Ngo vs John Carlson / Ryan Jaramillo7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBrock Steller / Jeremy Conkling vs Adam Choi / Allen Clendaniel1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesWilly Stone / Joe Buckwalter vs Richard Clendaniel / Brenden Raymond-Yakoubian6-3, 6-1
2022-04-03vs CurtisWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrock Steller / Phu Ngo vs Jack Perkins / NOEL LASTIMOSO6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJay Green / Randolph Bailey vs Anthony Brooks / Douglas Bliss6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJoe Buckwalter / Jeremy Conkling vs Marco Terracciano / John Kim6-4, 6-4
2022-04-03vs Allen CWon 21
L#1 DoublesRandolph Bailey / Willy Stone vs Allen Clendaniel / John Carlson2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJay Green / Joe Buckwalter vs Adam Choi / Ryan Jaramillo6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJeremy Conkling / Chip Sweeney vs Gayle Savage / Jesse Kreger6-3, 6-1
2022-03-25vs CurtisWon 30
W#1 DoublesPhu Ngo / Brock Steller vs Curtis Nelson / Anthony Brooks6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesRandolph Bailey / Jay Green vs NOEL LASTIMOSO / Marco Terracciano6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesChip Sweeney / Willy Stone vs John Kim / Douglas Bliss6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Joe Buckwalter
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.64
Jay Green
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.50
Jeremy Conkling
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Brock Steller
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.87
Willy Stone
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Chip Sweeney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Phu Ngo
published
Randolph Bailey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Randolph Bailey + Joe Buckwalter1440% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Joe Buckwalter
88W–77L career · 3 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Jay Green
77W–68L career · type S · 4 lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.64
3.5
Jeremy Conkling
55W–26L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Brock Steller
66W–51L career · type M · 3 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.25
3
Willy Stone
110W–70L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
2.87
Chip Sweeney
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Phu Ngo
47W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Randolph Bailey
7W–19L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.