Teams

Cherokee Town & CC (Christi Veach)*

USTA Atlanta Summer - 40 & Over Weekday Women · 3.0 Women (Arrie Lugar)

22 players · average NTRP 2.93 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 Women (Arrie Lugar) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Katherine Snell
published
3.11
Ellen Melcher
published
3.00
Carrie Brune
published 3
2.95
Sheila Hare
published
2.87
Deborah King
published 3
2.85
Amber Jenkins
published 3
2.85
Amber Almond
published 3
2.79
Sarah Rogers
published
2.77
Robin Bowen
published
2.71
Sarah O'Brien
published
2.71
Christi Veach
published 3
2.66
Rebecca Wallis
published
2.59
Erin Graner
published
2.54
Marilyn Cain
published
2.52
Annette Hays
published 3
Deborah Hurst
published 2.5
Jamie Newton
published
Kristine Nardelli
published
Lisa Hardymon
published
Maren Alvarez
published
Sunitha Shivaram
published
Susan Gornall
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christi Veach + Ellen Melcher5061% games+12.2% vs expected
Amber Almond + Sheila Hare11456% games+7.7% vs expected
Amber Jenkins + Carrie Brune4255% games+6.5% vs expected
Christi Veach + Robin Bowen81247% games+2.6% vs expected
Amber Almond + Ellen Melcher5449% games−4.1% vs expected
Deborah Hurst + Susan Gornall134 matchesnot enough data
Deborah King + Sarah O'Brien224 matchesnot enough data
Deborah King + Robin Bowen033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katherine Snell
20W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%4%96%
3.24
Ellen Melcher
24W–20L career · no lines in 2024
22%77%<1%
3.11
3
Carrie Brune
14W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.00
Sheila Hare
36W–38L career · no lines in 2024
63%37%<1%
2.95
3
Deborah King
26W–35L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Amber Jenkins
14W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Amber Almond
21W–21L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
2.85
Sarah Rogers
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
Robin Bowen
18W–32L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
Sarah O'Brien
15W–19L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Christi Veach
28W–31L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.71
Rebecca Wallis
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
2.66
Erin Graner
8W–14L career · no lines in 2024
26%73%<1%
2.59
Marilyn Cain
7W–10L career · no lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
2.54
3
Annette Hays
2W–9L career · type S · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
2.52
2.5
Deborah Hurst
8W–14L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jamie Newton
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kristine Nardelli
0W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lisa Hardymon
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Maren Alvarez
3W–11L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sunitha Shivaram
0W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Gornall
5W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.