Teams

Northern: 6.0 Raffa 55 Mxd

2024 55&Over Mixed · 6.0

17 players · average NTRP 2.95 / NORTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-03-09vs Thing 1Won 21
L#1 DoublesAndrew Mullin / Jo Anne Raffa vs Anton Keller / Penny Hill3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPaul Hook / Makiko Cichy vs George Polino / Diane Hernandez6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBernard Ettinger / Suzanne Hauber vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-02-17vs Thing 2Won 21
L#1 DoublesLinda Dygert / Paul Hook vs NICHOLAS AMODIO / Brenda Streeter3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCatherine Herman / Tim Brennan vs Raimundo Archibold / Gail Adams6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesStephen Acquario / Kathleen Moran vs Jodi Council / Karen Mahar6-3, 6-4
2024-02-10vs Make it a DoubleWon 21
L#1 DoublesPaula Doherty / Philip Hudson vs Eleanor Goodman / Allen Goodman3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMakiko Cichy / Paul Hook vs Eric Nickerson / Sue Wollner6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTim Brennan / Catherine Herman vs Edwin Rogers / Lynn Rogers6-4, 6-1
2024-02-03vs Thing 2Won 30
W#1 DoublesW Michael Reickert / Suzanne Hauber vs Jodi Council / Joyce Tarantino6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBernard Ettinger / Kathleen Moran vs Gail Adams / David Adams6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesPhilip Hudson / Gloria Hessell vs James Mylod / Karen Mahar3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-01-28vs Thing 1Won 30
W#1 DoublesPhilip Hudson / Nena Rezic vs Jim Best / Trish McKinney6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesW Michael Reickert / Suzanne Hauber vs George Schlottner / Stacey McGovern6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKathleen Moran / Bernard Ettinger vs Nat Rew / Wanda Fischer6-0, 4-6, 1-0
2024-01-20vs Make it a DoubleWon 21
W#1 DoublesPhilip Hudson / Nena Rezic vs Grace Cunningham / Fred Boehrer6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTim Brennan / Catherine Herman vs Eleanor Goodman / Allen Goodman3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPaul Hook / Shari Calnero vs Angela Urdanoff / Charles Zarriello6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Northern: 6.0 Raffa 55 Mxd601441098
2Thing 1327820148
3Thing 21451020153
4Make it a Double1571125179

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Nena Rezic
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.24
W Michael Reickert
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.10
Makiko Cichy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Kathleen Moran
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.88
Linda Dygert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Jo Anne Raffa
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.83
Suzanne Hauber
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.83
Paul Hook
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Andrew Mullin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Shari Calnero
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Paula Doherty
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.55
Gloria Hessell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Catherine Herman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Bernard Ettinger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Philip Hudson
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Stephen Acquario
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tim Brennan
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paul Hook + Makiko Cichy4167% games+14.9% vs expected
Philip Hudson + Nena Rezic5358% gamesnot enough data
Tim Brennan + Catherine Herman4357% gamesnot enough data
Tim Brennan + Kathleen Moran4259% gamesnot enough data
W Michael Reickert + Suzanne Hauber3259% gamesnot enough data
Paul Hook + Suzanne Hauber314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nena Rezic
25W–20L career · 5 lines in 2024
67%33%<1%
3.44
W Michael Reickert
46W–18L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%4%96%
3.24
Makiko Cichy
59W–14L career · 2 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.10
3
Kathleen Moran
102W–129L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Linda Dygert
84W–87L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Jo Anne Raffa
53W–44L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Suzanne Hauber
68W–90L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Paul Hook
68W–53L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Andrew Mullin
9W–2L career · type S · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
3
Shari Calnero
91W–101L career · 1 line in 2024
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Paula Doherty
50W–141L career · 3 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68
Gloria Hessell
39W–66L career · 1 line in 2024
36%64%<1%
2.55
3
Catherine Herman
22W–42L career · 3 lines in 2024
50%50%<1%
2.50
2.5
Bernard Ettinger
6W–2L career · type M · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Philip Hudson
18W–10L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Stephen Acquario
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Tim Brennan
92W–44L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.