Teams

OGTA: OGTAgonals

2026 18&Over Women Day Winter · 3.0 Day

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-03-18vs SHI: Flint Park Village PeopleWon 30
W#1 DoublesJulie Christie / Katerina Donovan vs Wendy Sayles / Gwen Shufro6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnastasia Fetisov / Melina Hamza-Smith vs Maryann Guthrie / Joanna Liebman4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAlexandra Bueso Vargas / Kimberly Steinberg vs Susan Barnes-Girling / Rebecca Blumberg6-4, 6-3
2026-03-11vs Westchester Country ClubWon 21
L#1 DoublesJulie Christie / Katerina Donovan vs Maureen O'Connor / Molly Cahill5-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesLindsay Tulchin / Alexandra Bueso Vargas vs Maggie Cifarelli / Christie Greear6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMelina Hamza-Smith / Anastasia Fetisov vs Kerry Soliman / Lizzy Monaghan6-1, 6-0
2026-02-27vs Sportime LI: LightningWon 21
W#1 DoublesMelanie Ende / Lauren Mattson vs Sharon Higgins / Edie Owen6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAlexandra Bueso Vargas / Lindsay Tulchin vs Gwynn Hurshman / Julie Rosenblatt6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMarisa Geddo / Anastasia Fetisov vs Linda Fang / Arleen Thomas1-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
Lauren Mattson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.90
Bonnie Wreschner
published 3
2.88
Kimberly Steinberg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Melanie Ende
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
Melina Hamza-Smith
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.81
Jennifer Garnett
published
2.77
Julie Christie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Anastasia Fetisov
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Katerina Donovan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.68
Marisa Geddo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Shirley Chan
published
2.65
Alexandra Bueso Vargas
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.58
Jennifer Pizzitola
published
2.51
Lindsay Tulchin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.49
Lauren Longest
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lindsay Tulchin + Alexandra Bueso Vargas9164% games+8.8% vs expected
Julie Christie + Katerina Donovan5352% games+5.9% vs expected
Lauren Longest + Anastasia Fetisov4265% games+5.4% vs expected
Jennifer Garnett + Alexandra Bueso Vargas4166% games+0.6% vs expected
Julie Christie + Bonnie Wreschner5448% games−2.7% vs expected
Julie Christie + Melina Hamza-Smith404 matchesnot enough data
Julie Christie + Lindsay Tulchin404 matchesnot enough data
Katerina Donovan + Melina Hamza-Smith314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Mattson
61W–36L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
2.97
3
Bonnie Wreschner
19W–18L career · no lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.90
Kimberly Steinberg
14W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.88
Melanie Ende
10W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%86%14%
2.86
Melina Hamza-Smith
20W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
2.84
Jennifer Garnett
16W–3L career · no lines in 2026
0%1%99%
2.81
Julie Christie
31W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Anastasia Fetisov
12W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
2.75
Katerina Donovan
27W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
Marisa Geddo
3W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
8%91%1%
2.68
Shirley Chan
6W–6L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
2.66
3
Alexandra Bueso Vargas
16W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
2.65
Jennifer Pizzitola
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
2.58
Lindsay Tulchin
17W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%47%53%
2.51
Lauren Longest
10W–3L career · no lines in 2026
0%53%47%
2.49

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.