Teams

BC-BilieJeanKing/AudieLeksunthon

2025 ADULT 40 & OVER - Beach Cities · BC Men - 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.43 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-03-29vs BC-PVTC/CraigSunada(formerlyChoe)Won 21
L#1 DoublesAlvin Chong / Audie Leksunthon vs Anthony Choe / Matthew Lengkeek1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAndrew Cheung vs Jonathan Wilner6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesGeorge Hernandez / Todd McGuiness vs Ashly Wong / Paul Huang6-4, 6-2
2025-03-01vs BC-Kramer/ChristopherBallLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlvin Chong / Audie Leksunthon vs Nemo Chen / William Padula2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesTodd McGuiness vs Vitaliy Rusakov1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesAnthony Tanner / Antonio Vega vs David Bradley / Dennis Lacharite4-6, 6-7
2025-01-11vs BC-Kramer/ChristopherBallWon 20
W#1 DoublesGeorge Hernandez / Todd McGuiness vs Chad Somers / William Padula7-5, 6-6
W#2 DoublesAntonio Vega / Ed McCarthy vs Nemo Chen / Todd Springer6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Men - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
George Hernandez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
Kelly McMillen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Andrew Cheung
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Anthony Tanner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Audie Leksunthon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Daniel Corrado
published 3.5
3.06
Todd McGuiness
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.99
Richard Alziebler
published
2.93
Alvin Chong
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.84
Brian Rodas
published 3.5
Antonio Vega
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Ed McCarthy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alvin Chong + Richard Alziebler0528% gamesnot enough data
Alvin Chong + Audie Leksunthon033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

George Hernandez
8W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Kelly McMillen
84W–81L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.38
3.5
Andrew Cheung
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Anthony Tanner
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Audie Leksunthon
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Daniel Corrado
1W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Todd McGuiness
5W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.06
Richard Alziebler
0W–7L career · no lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.99
3.5
Alvin Chong
4W–13L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
2.93
3.5
Brian Rodas
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
2.84
3
Antonio Vega
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ed McCarthy
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.