Teams

SHARON HTS CC CW8.5A

2024 COMBO · Women 8.5

23 players · average NTRP 4.19 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.88 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cate Liston
published 4.5
4.21
Lynette van Dell
published
4.16
Tara Garneau
published
4.16
Tracy Cowperthwaite
published
4.08
Ann Jaquith
published 4.5
4.03
Rhonda Bucklin
published
4.03
Donna Kaneko
published 4.5
4.02
Michelle McDermott
published
4.00
Harriet Ragozin
published 4
3.96
Laura Norden
published
3.94
Leslie Matsumura
published
3.94
Christina Bird
published 4
3.88
Jennifer Maravillas
published
3.81
Donelle Paisley
published 4
3.72
Claire Toffey
published 4
3.66
Claire Sheehan
published 4
3.64
Jillian Gee
published
3.57
Laurie Selover
published
3.49
Sally Fong
published
3.47
Lauren Denenberg
published
Karen Wickers
published
Sharon Yang
published
Terri Straube
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jillian Gee + Claire Toffey4452% games+0.5% vs expected
Michelle McDermott + Laura Norden4649% games−3.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cate Liston
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lynette van Dell
3W–14L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
4.21
Tara Garneau
11W–5L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%<1%
4.16
Tracy Cowperthwaite
14W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%11%89%
4.16
4.5
Ann Jaquith
10W–5L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
4.08
Rhonda Bucklin
12W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%42%58%
4.03
4.5
Donna Kaneko
9W–27L career · no lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
4.03
Michelle McDermott
10W–14L career · no lines in 2024
44%55%<1%
4.02
4
Harriet Ragozin
9W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
4.00
Laura Norden
11W–22L career · no lines in 2024
61%39%<1%
3.96
Leslie Matsumura
15W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.94
4
Christina Bird
11W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.94
Jennifer Maravillas
3W–8L career · no lines in 2024
82%18%<1%
3.88
4
Donelle Paisley
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Claire Toffey
8W–7L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Claire Sheehan
15W–18L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%<1%
3.66
Jillian Gee
26W–46L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%<1%
3.64
Laurie Selover
8W–29L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.57
Sally Fong
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
54%46%<1%
3.49
Lauren Denenberg
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
59%41%<1%
3.47
Karen Wickers
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sharon Yang
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Terri Straube
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.