Teams

MCC - Molly

2025 Valley Adult 40 & Over 2.5 W- 5.0 W - Spring · 4.0 Ladies

14 players · average NTRP 3.58 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-07vs Harlingen HEB - LucyLost 13
L#1 DoublesJaneth de la Fuente / Angelica Olivas vs Lilly Arias / Sylvia Pompa2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesJacqueline Abisad vs MARIA LEAL6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesVeronica Tellez / Dalia Sanchez vs Karla Garza / Cassie Goodell2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMolly Grossman / Tracy Clifton vs Imelda Cavazos / Bertha de la Rosa1-6, 2-6
2025-03-31vs MCC - IvonneLost 13
L#1 DoublesTracy Clifton / VARENKA MENA vs Elica MacHin / Barbara Duda5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJacqueline Abisad vs Rachel Torres6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDalia Sanchez / Veronica Tellez vs Maria Hoffman-Guardia / MARIENNE WONG7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJaneth de la Fuente / Angelica Olivas vs Claudia Pimentel / Juanita Ramos1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-03-18vs Harlingen HEB - DeniseSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMolly Grossman / Elda Zendejas vs Michelle Fennegan / Susan Michelle Kyral4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJacqueline Abisad vs Rachel Kram2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJaneth de la Fuente / VARENKA MENA vs Elizabeth Scaief / Paula Fields1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKim Boggus / Dalia Sanchez vs Rose Nuckols / Lyuba Levine6-1, 6-2
2025-02-24vs Harlingen HEB - DeniseSplit 22
L#1 DoublesClaudia Campoya / Angelica Olivas vs Elizabeth Scaief / Denise Kayani5-7, 6-7
L#1 SinglesVeronica Tellez vs Margo Russell3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMolly Grossman / Elda Zendejas vs Gina Garcia / Kelly Cerroni6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTracy Clifton / VARENKA MENA vs Susan Pockrus / Paula Fields6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-02-17vs MCC - IvonneLost 04
L#1 DoublesJeny Martinez / Tracy Clifton vs Juanita Ramos / Ivonne Tovar2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMaria del Carmen de la Fuente vs Rachel Torres4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMolly Grossman / Elda Zendejas vs Doris Giraldo / Maria Hoffman-Guardia1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesVeronica Tellez / Dalia Sanchez vs Barbara Duda / Claudia Pimentel6-7, 7-6, 0-1
2025-02-10vs Harlingen HEB - LucySplit 22
W#1 DoublesJeny Martinez / Molly Grossman vs Catalina Ramos / Lucia Cantu3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAraceli Salinas vs Bertha de la Rosa5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesClaudia Campoya / Angelica Olivas vs MARIA LEAL / Martha Houghton6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesTracy Clifton / Janeth de la Fuente vs Lilly Arias / Lilia Saracho3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Ladies have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Elda Zendejas
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.50
Jacqueline Abisad
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.47
Janeth de la Fuente
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.42
Veronica Tellez
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.38
Angelica Olivas
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.37
Jeny Martinez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Araceli Salinas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.32
Claudia Campoya
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
Dalia Sanchez
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.21
Maria del Carmen de la Fuente
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.10
VARENKA MENA
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Kim Boggus
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Molly Grossman
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Tracy Clifton
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Veronica Tellez + Dalia Sanchez3450% games+10.6% vs expected
Jeny Martinez + Elda Zendejas11268% games+9.2% vs expected
Veronica Tellez + Claudia Campoya5257% games+5.3% vs expected
Jacqueline Abisad + Veronica Tellez6361% games+5.0% vs expected
Molly Grossman + Elda Zendejas5354% games+4.0% vs expected
Jacqueline Abisad + Claudia Campoya7258% games−3.5% vs expected
Jeny Martinez + Janeth de la Fuente404 matchesnot enough data
Dalia Sanchez + Kim Boggus224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Elda Zendejas
41W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.51
3.5
Jacqueline Abisad
39W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.50
Janeth de la Fuente
11W–9L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
Veronica Tellez
23W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Angelica Olivas
8W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.38
Jeny Martinez
26W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%84%15%
3.37
4
Araceli Salinas
16W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
88%12%<1%
3.35
3.5
Claudia Campoya
31W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Dalia Sanchez
19W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.29
Maria del Carmen de la Fuente
6W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
VARENKA MENA
2W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.10
Kim Boggus
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Molly Grossman
8W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tracy Clifton
17W–24L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.