Teams

Marion/Ehlers/18&Over3.0W

2024 Marion Adult 18 & Over - Winter · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-03-29vs GO - CenterWon 10
W#1 SinglesAbigail Dellovade vs Sara Dahill6-0, 6-0
2024-03-24vs FK - LongWon 20
W#1 DoublesTaryn Schacter / Shawn Ridgely vs Carmel Knight / Oksana Velis6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesAbigail Dellovade vs Lucy Kaul6-1, 6-1
2024-03-06Won 10
W#1 SinglesAbigail Dellovade vs Courtney O'Connell6-0, 6-0
2024-03-04vs FK - LongWon 10
W#1 DoublesAbigail Dellovade / Ally Ehlers vs Carmel Knight / Tatyana Liversedge6-0, 6-2
2024-02-11vs FK - LongWon 10
W#2 SinglesAbigail Dellovade vs Niurca Gloria6-0, 6-1
2024-01-07vs GO - CenterWon 20
W#1 DoublesShawn Ridgely / Taryn Schacter vs Jennifer Russell / Jody Nielsen6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAbigail Dellovade vs Barbara Center6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Abigail Dellovade
usually #1 Singles 42%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.19
Shawn Ridgely
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Melody Licciardello
published
3.01
Nina Stanton
published
2.99
Hilary McNamara
published
2.98
Cara Owens
published 3.5
2.94
Kristin Milbrandt
published
Cara Wiechens
published 3
2.74
NANCY TUTEN
published
2.70
Jolinda Fisher
published
Jennifer Raney
published
Kelly Acevedo
published
Taryn Schacter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hayley Creasey- Rogers + Nina Stanton213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Abigail Dellovade
137W–49L career · 12 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.76
3.5
Shawn Ridgely
28W–26L career · 2 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
Melody Licciardello
13W–4L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.17
Nina Stanton
7W–7L career · no lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
3.01
Hilary McNamara
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%53%47%
2.99
3.5
Cara Owens
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
2.98
Kristin Milbrandt
13W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%65%34%
2.94
3
Cara Wiechens
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
NANCY TUTEN
14W–7L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.74
Jolinda Fisher
7W–9L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
2.70
Hayley Creasey- Rogers
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jennifer Raney
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kelly Acevedo
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sherry Louise Gronlund
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Taryn Schacter
6W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.