Teams

4-LPrivalle-HR

2023 Eno River Adult 55 & Over · 55 & Over Adult 4.0 Women Day

10 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-05-05vs 1-KOrr-CHTCLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Tusing / Donna Ware vs Emily Berman / Vicky Arne0-6, 6-7
2023-04-28vs 2-EHoover-YMCALost 02
L#1 DoublesLaura Privalle / Kay Mabe vs Diane Werner / Susan Fanelly2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMary Tusing / Beth Loeb vs Laura Weygandt / Kathy Endres1-6, 5-7
2023-04-21vs 3-CBobby-SBWon 10
W#2 DoublesDonna Ware / Mary Tusing vs Kecia Serwin / Ruthann Gray4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-04-14vs 1-KOrr-CHTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesKay Mabe / Mary Tusing vs Valerie Conklin / Wendy Nelson6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBeth Loeb / Nancee Merritt vs Kathy Orr / Emily Berman2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLaura Privalle / Donna Ware vs Emiko Thomsen / Rita O'Sullivan6-3, 7-5
2023-03-31vs 2-EHoover-YMCASplit 11
L#2 DoublesKay Mabe / Leona Buckley vs Kathy Endres / Laura Weygandt1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesBeth Loeb / Lee Daly vs Angela Miller / Barbara Gillespie7-5, 6-2
2023-03-24vs 3-CBobby-SBSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKay Mabe / Kathy Clark vs Nancy Cinoman / Carole Bobby1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesNancee Merritt / Beth Loeb vs Liz Kasberg / Barbara Sinopoli6-3, 7-6
2023-03-20vs 2-EHoover-YMCALost 01
L#1 DoublesKay Mabe / Elizabeth Wyngaarden vs Nancy Draughon / Kathy Endres2-6, 5-7
2023-03-19vs 3-CBobby-SBSplit 11
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Wyngaarden / Kay Mabe vs Kecia Serwin / Ruthann Gray4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBeth Loeb / Kathy Clark vs Bonnie Delmar / Margo Stutesman4-6, 1-6
2023-03-17vs 1-KOrr-CHTCWon 20
W#1 DoublesDonna Ware / Melissa Lutz vs Valerie Conklin / Emily Berman6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBeth Loeb / Leona Buckley vs Patty Dischinger / Jeanne Beckley6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 4.0 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Kay Mabe
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.70
Mary Tusing
published
3.63
Nancee Merritt
published
3.58
Melissa Lutz
published
3.57
Laura Privalle
published
3.56
Tracy Fletcher
published
3.54
Beth Loeb
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.45
Elizabeth Wyngaarden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.34
Leona Buckley
published
3.26
Donna Ware
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kay Mabe + Mary Tusing5161% games+10.4% vs expected
Kay Mabe + Beth Loeb6749% games−2.6% vs expected
Beth Loeb + Donna Ware31436% games−3.5% vs expected
Kay Mabe + Elizabeth Wyngaarden91150% games−5.1% vs expected
Kay Mabe + Donna Ware5749% gamesnot enough data
Donna Ware + Elizabeth Wyngaarden2840% gamesnot enough data
Beth Loeb + Elizabeth Wyngaarden3348% gamesnot enough data
Kay Mabe + Melissa Lutz134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kay Mabe
139W–143L career · 6 lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.80
Mary Tusing
10W–10L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.70
Nancee Merritt
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
3.63
Melissa Lutz
7W–8L career · no lines in 2023
28%71%<1%
3.58
Laura Privalle
16W–24L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.57
Tracy Fletcher
7W–9L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.56
4
Beth Loeb
124W–157L career · 6 lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
3.54
4
Elizabeth Wyngaarden
111W–133L career · 2 lines in 2023
65%35%<1%
3.45
Leona Buckley
7W–13L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Donna Ware
100W–185L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%92%4%
3.26

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.