Teams

BooneDocks - Harris

2022 Duval Adult 18 & Over - Women · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-07-24vs Ponte Vedra - EganLost 12
L#1 DoublesKelly Risdon / Jessica Ryals vs Jacqueline Bell Egan / Pamela Alpert2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLani Baruch / Reiko Sheridan vs Gina Fishman / Caroline Semmler6-0, 6-7
W#3 DoublesJacqueline Harris / Lisa Simon vs Stacie Nicandri / Joann Welborn6-2, 6-3
2022-07-17vs Ponte Vedra - EganWon 31
L#1 DoublesKelly Risdon / Beth Williams vs Pamela Alpert / Heather LaPrade5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLani Baruch / Shea Zahner vs Joann Welborn / Stacie Nicandri6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKatie Deering vs Jacqueline Bell Egan6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJacqueline Harris / Lisa Simon vs Margo Klar / Julie Warrenfeltz6-4, 0-6, 1-0
2022-07-10vs San Jose - JacksonWon 30
W#1 DoublesCarol Merritt / Jessica Ryals vs Nancy Apple / Karla Liguori6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesKatie Deering vs Rebecca Christie6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJacqueline Harris / Jennifer Angel vs Nancy Hennessy / Jennifer Candelino7-5, 6-1
2022-06-25vs Eagle Landing - BleielSplit 22
W#1 DoublesSteffi Stiefel / Kelly Risdon vs Michelle Reid / Kelly Atkins2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKatie Deering vs Khanna Gibson6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLani Baruch / Shea Zahner vs BEATRICE PLUMMER / Ruth Jones-Looney1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJacqueline Harris / Natalie Pettey vs Kimberly Besser / Mari Hinds2-6, 3-6
2022-06-15vs San Jose - JacksonWon 21
W#1 DoublesCarol Merritt / Lani Baruch vs Jennifer Candelino / Rebecca Christie6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKelly Risdon vs Heather Riley7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJacqueline Harris / Natalie Pettey vs Allison Korman Shelton / Jen Frenzel6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2022-05-28vs Baymeadows - LansangLost 02
L#1 DoublesKelly Risdon / Lani Baruch vs Ellen Dyal / Amanda Swearingen1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKatie Deering / Natalie Pettey vs Annalee Lansang / Courtney Luffler1-6, 6-7
2022-05-22vs Hidden Hills - GroceWon 31
W#1 DoublesJessica Ryals / Lani Baruch vs Kelly Groce / Michelle Jahn1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKatie Deering vs Natasha Senchuk6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesCarol Merritt / Lisa Simon vs Shelby Salvador / Danette Jarriel6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJacqueline Harris / Shea Zahner vs Jamie Wienckowski / Annette Mattiace4-6, 4-6
2022-04-24vs Duval/RoanLost 03
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Harris / Shea Zahner vs Kerri Robison / Grace Walsh2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesKelly Risdon vs Grace Sales0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Simon / Natalie Pettey vs Raquel Clark / Claudia Eikner3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Stephanie Vihlen
published
3.92
Katie Deering
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 4
3.89
Jessica Ryals
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Lisa Simon
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.61
Lani Baruch
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.60
Kelly Risdon
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.58
Jacqueline Harris
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.56
Natalie Pettey
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Jennifer Angel
published
Reiko Sheridan
published
Shea Zahner
published
Steffi Stiefel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lani Baruch + Jacqueline Harris6945% games−2.5% vs expected
Jacqueline Harris + Lisa Simon5543% gamesnot enough data
Lani Baruch + Kelly Risdon4440% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Simon + Katie Deering3449% gamesnot enough data
Kelly Risdon + Lisa Simon2444% gamesnot enough data
Natalie Pettey + Jacqueline Harris2339% gamesnot enough data
Natalie Pettey + Lisa Simon1431% gamesnot enough data
Lani Baruch + Jessica Ryals1441% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Vihlen
4W–11L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
4.08
4
Katie Deering
85W–68L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
3.92
Jessica Ryals
32W–21L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.89
Lisa Simon
35W–60L career · 4 lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.64
Lani Baruch
51W–79L career · 6 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
Kelly Risdon
33W–68L career · 6 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
Jacqueline Harris
46W–81L career · 7 lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.58
Natalie Pettey
14W–24L career · 4 lines in 2022
32%67%<1%
3.56
Jennifer Angel
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Reiko Sheridan
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Shea Zahner
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Steffi Stiefel
27W–14L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.