Teams

Columbia - MXD

2024 Columbia Adult Mixed 18 & Over League · 7.0 Mixed

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / MISSOURI

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-07-29vs Schmitz - ColumbiaSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKeith Wade / Tina Gibson vs Sarah Bohl / Neil Schmitz3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesArthur Yousif / Katie Wilkinson vs Lea Brandt / Jay Bryant-Wimp1-6, 0-6
2024-07-22vs Schmitz - ColumbiaSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLauren Crosby / Martin Liebstein vs Reagan Brown / Neil Schmitz7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJESSICA Wade / Keith Wade vs Jenny Gray / Aaron Gray6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2024-07-08vs Schmitz - ColumbiaWon 21
W#1 DoublesLauren Crosby / Martin Liebstein vs Lea Brandt / Jay Bryant-Wimp7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKeith Wade / Carolyn Spencer vs Aaron Gray / Jenny Gray6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDelali Kwame Buatsi / Katie Wilkinson vs Samuel Thompson / Liza Thompson3-6, 6-7
2024-07-01vs Schmitz - ColumbiaLost 12
W#1 DoublesJESSICA Wade / Keith Wade vs Reagan Brown / Neil Schmitz6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Malm-Buatsi / Delali Kwame Buatsi vs Lea Brandt / Jay Bryant-Wimp1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesTina Gibson / Arthur Yousif vs Liza Thompson / Samuel Thompson4-6, 2-6
2024-06-24vs Schmitz - ColumbiaLost 12
W#1 DoublesCarolyn Spencer / Martin Liebstein vs Lea Brandt / Neil Schmitz4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLauren Crosby / Arthur Yousif vs Jenny Gray / Aaron Gray4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Malm-Buatsi / Delali Kwame Buatsi vs Liza Thompson / Samuel Thompson2-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 7.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Columbia - MXD237819140

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Carolyn Spencer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.54
Stephanie Womack
published
3.52
Tina Gibson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.19
Delali Kwame Buatsi
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.71
Elizabeth Malm-Buatsi
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
JESSICA Wade
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Katie Wilkinson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Lauren Crosby
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carolyn Spencer
28W–9L career · 2 lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.58
Stephanie Womack
21W–35L career · no lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.54
Tina Gibson
16W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%43%57%
3.52
3.5
Delali Kwame Buatsi
3W–10L career · type S · 3 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
Elizabeth Malm-Buatsi
3W–20L career · 2 lines in 2024
98%2%<1%
2.71
JESSICA Wade
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Katie Wilkinson
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lauren Crosby
12W–3L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.