Teams

Team Nelson

2022 Coppermine Tri-Level 18 & Over · Coppermine Tri-Level 4.5,4.0,3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.80 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-12-04Lost 01
L#3 DoublesLaura Bull / Cintya Leveque vs Kimberly Ford / Lynne Cramer5-7, 5-7
2022-11-19vs Team AkcamLost 01
L#2 DoublesJanis Schlerf / Robin Bare vs Vicki Williamson / Jessica Walsh2-6, 1-6
2022-11-06vs Team AkcamWon 20
W#1 DoublesLauren Gurney / Maureen Martin vs Lolita Blair / Wendy Heger6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLaura Bull / Cintya Leveque vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-10-22Lost 01
L#3 DoublesTracy Flaherty / Cintya Leveque vs Kimberly Ford / Jennifer Lee5-7, 3-6
2022-10-09vs Team AkcamLost 01
L#2 DoublesLesley Tompkins / Janis Schlerf vs Vicki Williamson / Jessica Walsh2-6, 1-6
2022-08-29vs Team BakerWon 10
W#3 DoublesTracy Flaherty / Cintya Leveque vs Kimberly Ford / Eva Simmons-O'Brien7-6, 1-6, 1-0
2022-08-25vs Team BakerLost 02
L#1 DoublesLauren Gurney / Megan Hansen vs Anna Culiner / Sarah Reusing6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKristie Baynard / Joan Garlow vs Anne Blue / Debbie Hill3-6, 4-6
2022-08-18vs Team AkcamLost 01
L#2 DoublesLesley Tompkins / Janis Schlerf vs Jessica Walsh / Laurie Freese4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Coppermine Tri-Level 4.5,4.0,3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Lauren Gurney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.94
Robin Bare
published
3.80
Joan Garlow
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Tina Holmes
published
3.45
Lesley Tompkins
published
3.44
Brooke Davidson
published 3.5
3.44
Cintya Leveque
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Tracy Flaherty
published
3.17
Janis Schlerf
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Laura Bull
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Lauren Gurney
11W–17L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
4.32
Robin Bare
32W–20L career · no lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
3.94
4
Joan Garlow
156W–129L career · 1 line in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
Tina Holmes
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.56
Lesley Tompkins
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
3.45
3.5
Brooke Davidson
16W–22L career · no lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Cintya Leveque
299W–233L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
3.44
Tracy Flaherty
12W–19L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Janis Schlerf
17W–46L career · 3 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
Laura Bull
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.