Teams

KRamaswamy-ENO

2025 Eno River Singles 40 & Over · 40 & Over Singles 3.5 Men Evening

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2025-07-11vs MYoung-ENOLost 02
L#1 SinglesKiran Ramaswamy vs Chris Mansfield6-6
L#3 SinglesAmit Sachan vs Laurence Isaacs6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2025-07-03vs AYoung-EVWon 10
W#2 SinglesVamsee Pasangulapati vs Zach Rowles6-0, 6-2
2025-07-01vs RGildehaus-YMCAWon 20
W#1 SinglesAmit Sachan vs Sergei Krasnyanski6-4, 7-5
W#3 SinglesVamsee Pasangulapati vs Derek Saccoccio6-1, 6-1
2025-06-30Lost 01
L#2 SinglesNitni Agrawal vs Eric Chen3-6, 0-6
2025-06-26vs APineda-CHTCLost 01
L#1 SinglesKiran Ramaswamy vs Scott Benson4-6, 1-6
2025-06-25vs APineda-CHTCLost 01
L#1 SinglesAmit Sachan vs Scott Benson1-6, 2-6
2025-06-09Lost 01
L#3 SinglesNitni Agrawal vs Eric Chen6-7, 4-6
2025-05-22Lost 01
L#3 SinglesKiran Ramaswamy vs Andres Pineda3-6, 3-6
2025-05-19vs EAnderson-DFCLost 01
L#1 SinglesAmit Sachan vs Edward Anderson4-6, 2-6
2025-05-19vs RGildehaus-YMCALost 02
L#2 SinglesNitni Agrawal vs Vincent Illiano4-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesPradeep Hariharan vs Mario Vidich3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-05-08vs MYoung-ENOLost 01
L#3 SinglesKiran Ramaswamy vs Barry Gooch3-6, 3-6
2025-05-05vs AYoung-EVWon 20
W#1 SinglesAmit Sachan vs Joe Gonzalez7-6, 6-3
W#2 SinglesNitni Agrawal vs Zach Rowles6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Singles 3.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Vamsee Pasangulapati
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.72
Kiran Ramaswamy
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.65
Sameer Cheema
published
3.60
Karan Mehra
published
3.55
Pradeep Hariharan
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4
3.43
Amit Sachan
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.39
Nitni Agrawal
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3.5
Digvijay Singh
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amit Sachan + Kiran Ramaswamy15854% games+0.4% vs expected
Amit Sachan + Nitni Agrawal4250% games−2.7% vs expected
Pradeep Hariharan + Nitni Agrawal314 matchesnot enough data
Vamsee Pasangulapati + Kiran Ramaswamy224 matchesnot enough data
Nitni Agrawal + Kiran Ramaswamy213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Vamsee Pasangulapati
133W–75L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Kiran Ramaswamy
178W–127L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Sameer Cheema
12W–11L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.65
Karan Mehra
10W–31L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Pradeep Hariharan
197W–108L career · 1 line in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Amit Sachan
255W–240L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Nitni Agrawal
210W–123L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Digvijay Singh
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.