Teams

Wickertree 2

2025 SUMMER Combo Women · Summer 6.5W Combo

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-06-18vs New Albany Country ClubLost 02
L#2 DoublesKelly Willmer / Sari Schlonsky vs Yan Omen / Alix Hoekzema6-7, 5-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJennifer Epstein / Libby Seeley vs Marilee Hanna / Charlotte Beran4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Summer 6.5W Combo have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Kathleen McGuff
published
3.33
Mary McGuff
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.20
Kelly Willmer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Holly Bezold
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.97
Melissa Soderberg
published
2.94
Sara Bode
published
2.89
Sari Schlonsky
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Libby Seeley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Jennifer Epstein
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Cindy Nicolette
published 3
2.26
Kendra Vuticevski
published
Jill Pireu
published
Lauren Horton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sari Schlonsky + Kelly Willmer7164% games+5.3% vs expected
Jennifer Epstein + Kelly Willmer1742% games+4.0% vs expected
Sara Bode + Cindy Nicolette4749% games−0.9% vs expected
Kathleen McGuff + Mary McGuff4846% games−4.9% vs expected
Kathleen McGuff + Kendra Vuticevski404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathleen McGuff
40W–43L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Mary McGuff
102W–109L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
Kelly Willmer
96W–106L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Holly Bezold
64W–39L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
Melissa Soderberg
31W–26L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
Sara Bode
87W–69L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
Sari Schlonsky
51W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%77%22%
2.89
Libby Seeley
157W–89L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
2.83
Jennifer Epstein
13W–60L career · 1 line in 2025
91%9%<1%
2.81
3
Cindy Nicolette
54W–69L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%1%
2.67
Kendra Vuticevski
31W–22L career · no lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.26
Jill Pireu
69W–32L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lauren Horton
4W–25L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.