Teams

Reasner 3.5 - 55 Spring 23

2023 Decatur Spring Adult 55 and Over · 3.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-03-07vs Roberts 3.5 55 Spring 23Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSteve Pinchock / Thomas Hargrove vs Sam Alfano / Eugene McNutt0-6, 2-6
2023-03-04vs Roberts 3.5 55 Spring 23Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKeith Estes / Thomas Hargrove vs J Jones / Chuck Lamar3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2023-02-09vs Roberts 3.5 55 Spring 23Won 10
W#1 DoublesDennis Reasner / Thomas Hargrove vs Eugene McNutt / Chuck Lamar6-4, 6-3
2023-02-05vs Roberts 3.5 55 Spring 23Won 10
W#2 DoublesThomas Hargrove / Keith Estes vs J Jones / Larry Newman6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Marcus Thomas
published
3.22
Keith Estes
published
3.16
Thomas Hargrove
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.16
Dennis Reasner
published 3.5
3.15
Keith Sexton
published
3.15
Billy Driver
published 3.5
3.00
Tom Moss
published
2.86
Fred Burkert
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marcus Thomas
5W–15L career · no lines in 2023
74%26%<1%
3.41
Keith Estes
14W–10L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
Thomas Hargrove
87W–114L career · 7 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Dennis Reasner
15W–38L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.16
Keith Sexton
15W–23L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Billy Driver
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.15
Tom Moss
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
3.00
Fred Burkert
20W–44L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%16%
2.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.