Teams

Fisher/Burton/Nashville

2025 Adult 18 & Over - Nashville · 3.0 Women - Monday AM

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-23vs Hopson/NashvilleLost 14
L#1 DoublesHolly Fisher / Mary Katherine Seibels vs Ashley Watson / Marcy Burridge2-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesCourtney Irving vs Blaire Jett3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJulie Wilson / Melissa Burton vs Helen Hopson / Libba Alden7-6, 6-3
L#2 SinglesEmily Pierre vs Barbara Zwerner2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKelli Alarcon / Brooke Vane vs Hannah Wright / Jessica Northington5-7, 6-7
2025-03-17vs Hopson/NashvilleLost 23
L#1 DoublesMelissa Burton / Courtney Irving vs Marcy Burridge / Ashley Watson2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesBrooke Keane vs Blaire Jett5-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesKelli Alarcon / Holly Fisher vs Elizabeth Green / Mary Gwen Sagen6-1, 6-4
L#2 SinglesIvy Frazer vs Barbara Zwerner6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLori McClurg / Melinda Norris-Munro vs Lindsay Sanford / Libby Burke7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women - Monday AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Holly Fisher
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.99
Melissa Burton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.94
Courtney Irving
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.94
Nobu Junge
published
2.93
Mary Katherine Seibels
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Brooke Keane
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.83
Emily Pierre
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.79
Lori McClurg
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.75
Melinda Norris-Munro
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.75
Brooke Vane
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Leigh Ann Portale
published
2.71
Kelli Alarcon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.63
Resha Blivens
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Ivy Frazer
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Kacee McGuigan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Resha Blivens + Lori McClurg8359% games+14.0% vs expected
Holly Fisher + Mary Katherine Seibels61148% games+5.8% vs expected
Kelli Alarcon + Brooke Vane2350% games+1.3% vs expected
Brooke Keane + Brooke Vane1541% games−0.3% vs expected
Leigh Ann Portale + Nobu Junge314 matchesnot enough data
Melinda Norris-Munro + Resha Blivens224 matchesnot enough data
Melinda Norris-Munro + Lori McClurg314 matchesnot enough data
Kelli Alarcon + Holly Fisher303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Holly Fisher
40W–37L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.06
Melissa Burton
26W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Courtney Irving
9W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.94
Nobu Junge
14W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.94
Mary Katherine Seibels
25W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Brooke Keane
9W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%18%
2.87
Emily Pierre
7W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
2.83
Lori McClurg
20W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Melinda Norris-Munro
25W–16L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.75
3
Brooke Vane
13W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
2.75
Leigh Ann Portale
6W–17L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Kelli Alarcon
12W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Resha Blivens
16W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
2.63
Ivy Frazer
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kacee McGuigan
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.