Teams

Lata18/Davis/CAMP

2026 Combo 18 & Over-STA · Adult Men - 6.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 upcoming · 4 played
Sep 9 7:30 PM
The Creek at Mungo Park
Sep 16 6:30 PM
Country Club of Lexington
Sep 20 6:00 PM
The Creek at Mungo Park
Sep 23 6:30 PM
vs N/A
Lawson Davis
Sep 30 6:30 PM
Lexington County Tennis Complex
2026-08-26vs Lata18/Small/LCCWon 21
L#1 DoublesAlec Deboer / Josh Lusk vs Lane Small / Wilson Pang6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesTrevor Olenchuk / Jacob Taylor vs Brian Heaberlin / Ryan Baker6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKyle Olenchuk / Robert Boland vs Garrett Prochaska / Wilkins Weiss6-0, 6-2
2026-08-19vs LATA18/Patterson/LCTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesKyle Olenchuk / Josh Lusk vs James Youmans / Evan Graves6-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesTrevor Olenchuk / Jacob Taylor vs Matthew Addison / Andrew Keough6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBrannon Hagins / Robert Boland vs Michael Mains / David Bowen6-1, 6-1
2026-08-09vs Lata18/Small/LCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesLawson Davis / Jacob Taylor vs Mark Rugg / Ryan Baker7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAlec Deboer / Gabriel Moura vs Alex Taber / Wilkins Weiss5-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesKyle Olenchuk / Filipe Cupertino vs Brian Heaberlin / Wilson Pang6-3, 6-4
2026-07-29vs LATA18/Patterson/LCTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesTrevor Olenchuk / Gabriel Moura vs Michael Mains / John Ellis6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKyle Olenchuk / Josh Lusk vs Bryan Blitch / Chris Moody6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAlec Deboer / Jacob Taylor vs David Bowen / Christopher Pricenor7-6, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Adult Men - 6.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lata18/Davis/CAMP3072470
2Lata18/Small/LCC2172571
3LATA18/Patterson/LCTC0411122145

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Lawson Davis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.50
Trevor Olenchuk
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.44
Kyle Olenchuk
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.41
Brannon Hagins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Alec Deboer
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Jacob Taylor
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.15
Gabriel Moura
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.03
Filipe Cupertino
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Josh Lusk
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.66
Gavin McMillion
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lawson Davis + Kyle Olenchuk5260% games+14.0% vs expected
Lawson Davis + Jacob Taylor314 matchesnot enough data
Alec Deboer + Trevor Olenchuk314 matchesnot enough data
Josh Lusk + Kyle Olenchuk314 matchesnot enough data
Lawson Davis + Trevor Olenchuk303 matchesnot enough data
Jacob Taylor + Trevor Olenchuk303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lawson Davis
15W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.50
Trevor Olenchuk
28W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.50
Kyle Olenchuk
21W–9L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.44
3.5
Brannon Hagins
9W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Alec Deboer
11W–13L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
Jacob Taylor
53W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%3%97%
3.27
Gabriel Moura
24W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%13%87%
3.15
Filipe Cupertino
40W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.03
Josh Lusk
11W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
2.94
Gavin McMillion
3W–1L career · no lines in 2026
13%86%1%
2.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.