Teams

GEPTA-7.0-Adult/65+M(Tepsick)(TW)

SouthernNewMexico · 2024 USA ADULT 65 & OVER LEAGUE

10 players · average NTRP 3.33 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-10-27vs GEPTA/Levin/65&over/7.0MLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarlos Rodriguez Bravo / James Zanolli vs Robert Jack / David Kern4-6, 2-6
2024-10-06Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDaniel Gallatin / Carlos Rodriguez Bravo vs SIMON SILVA / William Levin2-6, 4-6
2024-09-18Won 10
W#2 DoublesDaniel Gallatin / Carlos Rodriguez Bravo vs Andrew Michnovicz / James McCleland6-4, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 2024 USA ADULT 65 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Levin/65&over/7.0M712048146
2GEPTA-7.0-Adult/65+M(Tepsick)(TW)2681636250
3GEPTA-7.0-Adult/65+M(Michnovicz)(Lions)1321022136

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Carlos de Regules
usually #3 Doubles 35%, also #1 Doubles 32% · published 3.5
Carlos Rodriguez Bravo
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.84
Daniel Gallatin
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 35% · published 3
Ed Savedra
usually #2 Doubles 34%, also #1 Doubles 32% · published
Fernando Lopez
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Friedrich Ransom-Becker
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
James Zanolli
usually #3 Doubles 48%, also #4 Doubles 26% · published
Osvaldo Orozco
usually #3 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 26% · published
Thomas Lore
usually #2 Doubles 41%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
William Tepsick
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 28% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

William Tepsick + Ed Savedra0633% gamesnot enough data
Carlos de Regules + Osvaldo Orozco2440% gamesnot enough data
Thomas Lore + Osvaldo Orozco5059% gamesnot enough data
William Tepsick + James Zanolli0520% gamesnot enough data
Carlos de Regules + Fernando Lopez2349% gamesnot enough data
Ed Savedra + Daniel Gallatin3250% gamesnot enough data
Thomas Lore + Ed Savedra224 matchesnot enough data
William Tepsick + Carlos de Regules044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carlos de Regules
79W–83L career · 37 lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Carlos Rodriguez Bravo
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Daniel Gallatin
52W–80L career · 40 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
2.84
Ed Savedra
53W–71L career · 38 lines in 2024
not enough data
Fernando Lopez
13W–20L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Friedrich Ransom-Becker
8W–22L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
James Zanolli
6W–38L career · 23 lines in 2024
not enough data
Osvaldo Orozco
39W–51L career · 19 lines in 2024
not enough data
Thomas Lore
61W–74L career · 22 lines in 2024
not enough data
William Tepsick
22W–82L career · 32 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.