Teams

SKY BLUE

2023 CTA WOMEN'S SUMMER DAYTIME - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - SUMMER DAYTIME

9 players · average NTRP 2.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-08-08vs VC BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesLauryn Meyer / Jenifer Marom vs Kate Patton / Nancy Fridstein4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMichelle Hoskins / Jessica Dewees vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-08-01Won 10
W#1 SinglesJessica Dewees vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-07-25vs CHCC GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesJessica Dewees / Jenifer Marom vs Ashley Balakas / Courtney Berglund6-2, 6-2
2023-07-18vs GAC GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesJenine Camins / Candace Kristensson vs JoAnn Porter / Jeni Anderson7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJenifer Marom vs Allison Keefer6-2, 6-4
2023-07-13vs GCC PINKWon 10
W#2 DoublesJenine Camins / Colleen Nelson vs Meghan Callaway / Deb Ridenour6-4, 6-4
2023-06-27vs EM GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesJessica Dewees / Lauryn Meyer vs Lisa Ide / Kesa Sullivan7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJenine Camins vs Brooke Bolinske2-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - SUMMER DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.43 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Kerry Hutcheson
published 3
2.78
Jessica Dewees
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.67
Lauryn Meyer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.33
Emily Hoagland
published
2.27
Michelle Hoskins
published
Candace Kristensson
published 2.5
2.20
Jenifer Marom
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.10
Jenine Camins
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
1.82
Kate Kalstein
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jenifer Marom + Emily Hoagland3451% games−0.9% vs expected
Jenifer Marom + Jenine Camins7652% games−10.6% vs expected
Michelle Hoskins + Emily Hoagland213 matchesnot enough data
Jessica Dewees + Jenifer Marom213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Kerry Hutcheson
58W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%3%97%
3.26
3
Jessica Dewees
70W–33L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Lauryn Meyer
45W–40L career · 2 lines in 2023
11%88%1%
2.67
Emily Hoagland
13W–10L career · no lines in 2023
0%88%12%
2.33
Michelle Hoskins
12W–39L career · no lines in 2023
0%95%5%
2.27
2.5
Candace Kristensson
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Jenifer Marom
51W–51L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.20
2.5
Jenine Camins
39W–56L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Kate Kalstein
0W–22L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
1.82

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.