Teams

THPRD-Pham

2021 Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

12 players · average NTRP 3.88 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Denielle Edlund
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.85
David Pham
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.83
Joerg Droste
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.81
Agus Rusli
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.68
Vincent Lee
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.59
Patrick Maginnis
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.58
Heidi Wilcox
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Donna Kennish
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.46
Heike Droste
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.40
Maria Kosmetatos
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Laura Maginnis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.12
Hoover Li
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Results6 ties
2020-10-24Won 30
W#1 DoublesHeidi Wilcox / Vincent Lee vs Allison Fryman / Shane Wilson5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHeike Droste / Joerg Droste vs Ginny Nguyen / Ryan Ebisu6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDenielle Edlund / Agus Rusli vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2020-10-11Won 21
W#1 DoublesHeidi Wilcox / Agus Rusli vs Diane di Vito / Mitchell Whitehurst6-0, 7-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Kuhr / Vincent Lee vs Tamara Justus / Mubashir Cheema7-5, 4-1
W#3 DoublesMaria Kosmetatos / Hoover Li vs Irena Ilcheva / Ajay Kumar Tippisetti6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2020-10-04Lost 12
W#1 DoublesHeidi Wilcox / David Pham vs Crystal Bryant / Dave Vinik6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLaura Maginnis / Patrick Maginnis vs Tami McAra / Kelly Woodard6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMaria Kosmetatos / Hoover Li vs Linda Binns / Martin Jeffrey Binns6-4, 6-2
2020-09-20Lost 12
W#1 DoublesDenielle Edlund / Agus Rusli vs Kyoko Adcock / Atom Fjeldsted6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesTheresa Mullally / David Pham vs Chizuru Watanabe / Jason Shiloh Moore7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLaura Maginnis / Patrick Maginnis vs Anna Reutin / Keisuke Komine6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2020-09-19Lost 12
L#1 DoublesDonna Kennish / Hoover Li vs Mike Robertson / Brooke Daugherty6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTheresa Mullally / David Pham vs Stephanie Paulson / Jon Monson2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJennifer Kuhr / Patrick Maginnis vs Shannon DeVall / Eric Anderson6-2, 6-4
2020-09-05Lost 12
W#1 DoublesDonna Kennish / Agus Rusli vs Chizuru Watanabe / Mark Tryon6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesStephanie Leeding / Vincent Lee vs Anna Reutin / Kofi Asare-Konadu7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHeike Droste / Joerg Droste vs Misuzu Komine / Yuya Fujii7-6, 0-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Denielle Edlund
66W–25L career
not enough data
4
David Pham
147W–109L career
0%98%2%
3.85
4
Joerg Droste
95W–66L career
0%99%1%
3.83
4
Agus Rusli
178W–86L career
0%99%1%
3.81
4
Vincent Lee
136W–76L career
5%94%0%
3.68
4
Patrick Maginnis
112W–54L career
14%86%0%
3.59
4
Heidi Wilcox
86W–87L career
15%85%0%
3.58
4
Donna Kennish
137W–120L career
23%77%0%
3.54
3.5
Heike Droste
158W–91L career
0%89%11%
3.46
3.5
Maria Kosmetatos
54W–65L career
0%93%7%
3.40
3.5
Laura Maginnis
82W–48L career
4%95%1%
3.24
3.5
Hoover Li
61W–51L career
18%81%1%
3.12

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.