Teams

To.Larrichio55C

2026 Capital Combo 55 & Over · 8.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.22 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-31vs Ri.Pfeiffer55CLost 12
L#1 DoublesAlex Newman / Bryan Simpson vs David Bell / Mark Combs4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesWilliam Adams / Mark Gunter vs Clay Garst / Alan Crews2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTom Larrichio / Scott Jamison vs John VanDeWater / Allan Badulis5-7, 2-6
2026-08-25vs Ri.Pfeiffer55CWon 21
W#1 DoublesW Troutman / Bruce Moore vs William Edwards / Clay Garst6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJames Klemenz / George Newsome vs Dayn Harum / Bradley Ransome6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesHady Abi-Aad / William Adams vs John Trimp / Scott McElreath4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ri.Pfeiffer55C000000
2To.Larrichio55C000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
George Newsome
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.15
Bruce Moore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.07
Hady Abi-Aad
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.03
Cliff Ray
published 4
4.02
Tom Larrichio
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.91
W Troutman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.84
Tom Morrow
published 4
3.80
James Klemenz
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.69
Bryan Simpson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Mark Gunter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Scott Jamison
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tom Larrichio + W Troutman17265% games+2.1% vs expected
Tom Morrow + Bryan Simpson12458% games+0.4% vs expected
Tom Larrichio + Cliff Ray5952% gamesnot enough data
Tom Larrichio + Tom Morrow6360% gamesnot enough data
Tom Morrow + W Troutman5257% gamesnot enough data
James Klemenz + Tom Morrow4256% gamesnot enough data
Bruce Moore + Tom Larrichio3258% gamesnot enough data
Cliff Ray + Hady Abi-Aad0534% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
George Newsome
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
Bruce Moore
67W–39L career · 1 line in 2026
13%87%<1%
4.15
4.5
Hady Abi-Aad
30W–81L career · 1 line in 2026
29%71%<1%
4.07
4
Cliff Ray
45W–55L career · type A · no lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
4.03
4.5
Tom Larrichio
132W–95L career · 1 line in 2026
43%57%<1%
4.02
4
W Troutman
356W–116L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%76%23%
3.91
4
Tom Morrow
276W–126L career · no lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
James Klemenz
188W–132L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Bryan Simpson
18W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
7%92%1%
3.69
Mark Gunter
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Scott Jamison
22W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.