Teams

Sportime Harbor Island

2023 Tri Level Women · 4.5,4.0,3.5

22 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTHERN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule17 played
2023-12-10vs MKCCWon 10
W#3 DoublesJennifer Helgesen / Alison Bonaviso vs Paige Siek / Marielise Watts6-0, 6-1
2023-12-03vs Westchester Country ClubLost 01
L#3 DoublesSondra Lavin / Amy Pepe vs Katrina Pape / Valerie Polera6-7, 4-6
2023-11-19vs Westchester Country ClubLost 01
L#3 DoublesJennifer Helgesen / Jennifer Naso vs Laura Cramer / Laurie Hoffman7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2023-11-12Won 10
W#3 DoublesJennifer Helgesen / Allyson Wuensch vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-11-04vs WTC: NY Tri-4.5 Triple ThreatSplit 11
L#1 DoublesFrancesca Silverman / Anna Blome vs Jacqueline Clark / Jennifer Rock1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesIris Friedman / Alison Bonaviso vs Catherine Paterra / Nancy Ossenfort6-4, 6-4
2023-10-29vs Chestnut Ridge: UnmatchablesLost 02
L#1 DoublesAnna Blome / Deb Parnes vs Jamie Taffet / Stacy Taffet5-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSondra Lavin / Amy Pepe vs CHRISTY COUNTS / Jessica Bremer6-7, 7-6, 0-1
2023-10-22vs Tennis Club of HastingsLost 02
L#1 DoublesBlake Guzman / Anna Blome vs Jiyon Lee / Heather Rich2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJoy Sexton / Iris Friedman vs Kate Kelly / Shannon van Loon5-7, 1-6
2023-10-15vs Premier AthleticLost 01
L#3 DoublesJoy Sexton / Allyson Wuensch vs Rovena Juman / Ronni Jarvis4-6, 4-6
2023-10-01vs Westchester Avenue Tennis ClubSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAnna Blome / Cintia Shiro vs Emilie Chang / Sadie Shackelford2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Helgesen / Jennifer Naso vs Crystal Nicolson / Connie Kim6-1, 7-5
2023-04-01vs New Rochelle Racquet ClubWon 20
W#1 DoublesSondra Lavin / Cintia Shiro vs Jennifer Reynolds / Elizabeth Luth6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Naso / Alison Bonaviso vs Francine Pollack / Lindsey Azzaretti6-0, 6-1
2023-03-26vs Southern: WTC Hot ShotsWon 10
W#2 DoublesAllyson Wuensch / Jennifer Naso vs Kelli Lannamann / Michele Smith6-0, 6-3
2023-03-12vs Club fit Briarcliff: AranaLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoy Sexton / Amy Pepe vs Venus Jones / Lisa Dawson2-6, 6-7
2023-03-05vs Chestnut Ridge: UnmatchablesWon 10
W#2 DoublesLaxmi Wordham / Amy Pepe vs Yaysoon Phillips / Anne Kelly6-7, 4-2
2023-02-26vs WTC: NY Tri-4.5 Triple ThreatSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCintia Shiro / Miran Robarts vs Deanna Santoro / Sarah Liddle6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJoy Sexton / Molly Broaddus vs Ellen Leigh / Heidi Paul6-1, 6-4
2023-01-28vs WTC: NY Tri-4.5 Triple ThreatWon 20
W#1 DoublesSondra Lavin / Jennifer Naso vs Cinthia Griot / Melissa Edwards4-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBeth Woodtli / Alison Bonaviso vs Marlena Simmons / Caroline Nagle6-3, 6-2
2023-01-22vs Eastern/Chilton/4.5Tri-LevelWomenLost 01
L#2 DoublesAllyson Wuensch / Lee Wipper vs Laura Zarba / Robin Muskin3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-01-15vs Sportime Harbor IslandWon 10
W#2 DoublesJoy Sexton / Sondra Lavin vs Iris Friedman / Jennifer Murphy7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5,4.0,3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.77
Carlos Campo
published 5
Anna Blome
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.15
Francesca Silverman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.15
Cintia Shiro
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.05
Blake Guzman
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 4.5
3.78
Salam Turki
published
3.77
Jennifer Naso
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.73
Allison Gibbs
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 4
3.63
Sondra Lavin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.56
Allyson Wuensch
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Deb Parnes
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.54
Sherlia Shi
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.40
Susanne Sparks
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.39
Aileen Calnan-Burke
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.36
Jennifer Helgesen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Joy Sexton
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.28
Amy Pepe
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
Lisa Samson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Alison Bonaviso
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.05
Paula Lapkin
published
2.92
Iris Friedman
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Susan Vaughan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alison Bonaviso + Jennifer Naso6071% games+22.6% vs expected
Lisa Samson + Jennifer Naso5355% games+11.2% vs expected
Joy Sexton + Sondra Lavin4258% games+8.3% vs expected
Jennifer Naso + Sondra Lavin9356% games+7.7% vs expected
Jennifer Helgesen + Joy Sexton7256% games+7.1% vs expected
Lisa Samson + Allison Gibbs161151% games+4.0% vs expected
Joy Sexton + Amy Pepe221254% games+3.7% vs expected
Allison Gibbs + Cintia Shiro3448% games+1.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Carlos Campo
34W–30L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
4.77
4.5
Anna Blome
19W–9L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Francesca Silverman
26W–30L career · 1 line in 2023
12%88%<1%
4.15
4.5
Cintia Shiro
264W–196L career · 3 lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
4.15
4.5
Blake Guzman
55W–43L career · 10 lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
4.05
Salam Turki
93W–39L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.78
Jennifer Naso
101W–44L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Allison Gibbs
177W–169L career · 9 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
Sondra Lavin
87W–58L career · 4 lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
3.63
4
Allyson Wuensch
79W–74L career · 2 lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.56
4
Deb Parnes
119W–133L career · 4 lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.56
4
Sherlia Shi
161W–217L career · 7 lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Susanne Sparks
132W–210L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Aileen Calnan-Burke
97W–114L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.39
Jennifer Helgesen
101W–71L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
3.36
Joy Sexton
91W–82L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Amy Pepe
116W–58L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Lisa Samson
112W–142L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Alison Bonaviso
92W–80L career · 4 lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
3.17
Paula Lapkin
66W–82L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.05
3.5
Iris Friedman
65W–76L career · 7 lines in 2023
72%28%<1%
2.92
Susan Vaughan
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.