Teams

SLewis/Memphis

2026 Adult 18 & Over -Memphis · 2.5 Women 18 & over

5 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-05-09vs Justice/MemphisWon 20
W#1 DoublesPatricia Barker / Jennie Silk vs Anna Claire Gleason / Rachel Veteto6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLaura Gilluly / Allie Olson Battle vs Neely Mcdurmon / Anna Embry6-0, 6-3
2026-04-25vs Blanton/MemphisLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarianne Smith / Jennie Silk vs Renee DeGutis / Sarah Richardson1-6, 4-6
2026-04-22vs Cleveland/MemphisSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSally Lewis / Allie Olson Battle vs Connie Clarkson / Peyton Corbin3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesCasey Gleysteen vs Christa Smith6-3, 6-2
2026-04-16vs Nelson/MemphisLost 02
L#1 DoublesSally Lewis / Patricia Barker vs Cathy Herrington / Diana Sanders6-3, 3-3
L#1 SinglesCasey Gleysteen vs Joelle Rogin3-6, 5-7
2026-04-15vs Wright/MemphisLost 01
L#1 DoublesJennie Silk / Allie Olson Battle vs Kelcie Nollner / Rachel Spangler1-6, 1-6
2026-04-04vs Ray/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesMarianne Smith / Patricia Barker vs Clare Santos / Shilpa Narina5-7, 5-7
L#1 SinglesCasey Gleysteen vs Claire Murk3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSally Lewis / Alice Kerley vs Surayyah Hasan / Rachel Crawford4-6, 0-6
2026-03-28vs Biedenharn/MemphisWon 20
W#1 SinglesCasey Gleysteen vs Rebekah Shappley7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJennie Silk / Marianne Smith vs Shibahn Rodda / Tara Hallie Ware6-3, 6-2
2026-03-21vs Taylor/MemphisLost 01
L#1 DoublesJennie Silk / Mary Allison Becksfort vs Catherine Wylie / Destiny Taylor0-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-03-07vs JLewis/MemphisLost 02
L#1 DoublesAllie Olson Battle / Patricia Barker vs Barbara Wilson / Ashley Walker7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesCasey Gleysteen vs Terry Bondurant3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women 18 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.13 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.19
Patricia Barker
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.17
Casey Gleysteen
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 2.5
2.16
Laura Gilluly
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.08
Jennie Silk
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
2.04
Sally Lewis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Patricia Barker
3W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
2.5
Casey Gleysteen
13W–40L career · 10 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.17
Laura Gilluly
3W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.16
Jennie Silk
6W–21L career · 11 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Sally Lewis
3W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.