Teams

CACM RED

2023 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

7 players · average NTRP 3.42 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-20vs WP NAVYLost 01
L#3 DoublesJim Gordon / Daniel Sloane vs Fred DeFilippo / Fred Stein2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-07-18vs EM GOLDLost 02
L#1 SinglesScott Hampel vs Brent Bowman6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMichael Peters / Daniel Sloane vs Mike Mohrman / David Steimel7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2023-07-11vs DTC REDLost 02
L#2 DoublesBoyd May / Rick Lannon vs Chris Samuelson / Jason Curran1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJim Gordon / Daniel Gralla vs Paul Bunn / Howard Sankel1-6, 3-6
2023-06-27vs SKY REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesRick Lannon / Scott Hampel vs Brian Dwyer / Craig Mills1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJim Gordon / Daniel Gralla vs John Kippley / Chad Cleveland1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-06-20vs GPTC REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesRick Lannon / ARTHUR VAUGHN vs Clifford Goldberg / David Junta0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Peters / Daniel Sloane vs Jason Hladik / Viktor Bojilov2-6, 3-6
2023-06-13vs CP GREENSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBoyd May / Rick Lannon vs Eddie Sierra / William Hissam7-5, 7-6
L#2 DoublesBlake Palmer / Daniel Gralla vs Edmond Barbe / Kyungsoo Jeong5-7, 5-7
2023-06-06vs CM BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesBoyd May / Rick Lannon vs Chris Chang / Christopher Hailes4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesDaniel Sloane / Timothy Pillow vs Buck Flannigan / Michael Donovan2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
ARTHUR VAUGHN
published 3.5
3.31
Daniel Gralla
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Scott Hampel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Daniel Sloane
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Blake Palmer
published 3.5
2.97
Rick Lannon
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.87
Jim Gordon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daniel Gralla + Daniel Sloane14953% games−3.7% vs expected
Rick Lannon + Scott Hampel224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
ARTHUR VAUGHN
26W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Daniel Gralla
56W–56L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Scott Hampel
17W–15L career · 2 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Daniel Sloane
40W–56L career · 4 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Blake Palmer
6W–22L career · no lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
2.98
3
Rick Lannon
77W–125L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
2.97
Jim Gordon
17W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
2.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.