Teams

Campbell/Knoxville

2024 Tri-Level 55 & Over-Knoxville · 4.5

12 players · average NTRP 4.17 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-02-24vs Houck/Knoxville/Tri55Won 20
W#2 DoublesKatty McFee / Joan Ewers vs Monica Freeman / Lynn Johnson6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKelly Kramer / Julie Burnette Kirkpatrick vs Stacy Carlson / Teresa Helton6-1, 6-2
2024-02-10vs Houck/Knoxville/Tri55Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMary Richardson / Cheryl Thompson vs Kristie Danby / Lynn Johnson6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTerryann Nelson / Lori Thompson vs Allison Chandler / Angela Strange1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKimberly Morris / Jennifer Campbell vs Debi Houck / Teresa Helton6-4, 7-5
2024-02-03vs Houck/Knoxville/Tri55Won 21
L#1 DoublesChristina Kaak / Mary Richardson vs Charlene Smith / Kristie Danby3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTerryann Nelson / Lori Thompson vs Allison Chandler / Monica Freeman6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesPaige Troutman / Kimberly Morris vs Stacy Carlson / Donna French6-1, 6-2
2024-01-27vs Houck/Knoxville/Tri55Won 20
W#1 DoublesSandi Wilson / Mary Richardson vs Lindsay McNabb / Angela Strange6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKatty McFee / Elizabeth Jarvis vs Allison Chandler / Laura Ivey6-1, 6-4
2024-01-13vs Houck/Knoxville/Tri55Lost 12
L#1 DoublesCheryl Thompson / Sandi Wilson vs Lindsay McNabb / Kristie Danby3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKelly Kramer / Julie Burnette Kirkpatrick vs Lynn Johnson / Cindy Henry3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesPaige Troutman / Kimberly Morris vs Donna French / Gabriela Vidal de Ramirez6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Campbell/Knoxville328714120
2Houck/Knoxville/Tri55237817133

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Christina Kaak
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.94
Joan Ewers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.91
Lori Thompson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.83
Cheryl Thompson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.77
Katty McFee
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.67
Terryann Nelson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Elizabeth Jarvis
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.65
Sandi Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Julie Burnette Kirkpatrick
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.35
Kimberly Morris
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Paige Troutman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Richardson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joan Ewers + Katty McFee14267% games+14.1% vs expected
Paige Troutman + Kimberly Morris7366% games+12.2% vs expected
Julie Burnette Kirkpatrick + Kimberly Morris3352% games+2.0% vs expected
Elizabeth Jarvis + Katty McFee4167% gamesnot enough data
Terryann Nelson + Lori Thompson224 matchesnot enough data
Joan Ewers + Julie Burnette Kirkpatrick303 matchesnot enough data
Sandi Wilson + Kimberly Morris303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christina Kaak
22W–17L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%55%44%
3.98
Joan Ewers
49W–8L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%66%34%
3.94
Lori Thompson
47W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.91
4.5
Cheryl Thompson
4W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
91%9%<1%
3.83
Katty McFee
33W–8L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
Terryann Nelson
32W–27L career · 2 lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Elizabeth Jarvis
13W–5L career · 4 lines in 2024
11%89%<1%
3.66
Sandi Wilson
33W–20L career · 4 lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.65
Julie Burnette Kirkpatrick
34W–14L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.43
Kimberly Morris
59W–26L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%87%13%
3.35
Paige Troutman
43W–21L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%90%10%
3.33
Mary Richardson
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.