Teams

GEPTA/Baeza/65&over/7.0W

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA ADULT 65 & OVER LEAGUE

14 players · average NTRP / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2025 USA ADULT 65 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Elizabeth Wakefield
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Ellen Hughes
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Gabriela Stoiber
usually #2 Doubles 37%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Gerla Gallardo
usually #2 Doubles 53%, also #1 Doubles 39% · published
Guadalupe Castillo
usually #3 Doubles 47%, also #1 Doubles 26% · published
Isela Rayon
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Kerry Lore
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published
Margaret Baeza
usually #3 Doubles 35%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Maria del Carmen Ledezma
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Monica Morga
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Patricia Arreola
usually #3 Doubles 48%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published
Patricia Dalbin
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 37% · published
Sara Blanco
usually #1 Doubles 48%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Ursula Morawietz
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 21% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Guadalupe Castillo + Ursula Morawietz14957% gamesnot enough data
Gerla Gallardo + Guadalupe Castillo12656% gamesnot enough data
Maria del Carmen Ledezma + Sara Blanco61045% gamesnot enough data
Gerla Gallardo + Ursula Morawietz7356% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Wakefield + Kerry Lore9070% gamesnot enough data
Kerry Lore + Patricia Dalbin6366% gamesnot enough data
Gerla Gallardo + Ellen Hughes6261% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Wakefield + Gabriela Stoiber3457% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Wakefield
37W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Ellen Hughes
74W–86L career · 22 lines in 2025
not enough data
Gabriela Stoiber
63W–57L career · 27 lines in 2025
not enough data
Gerla Gallardo
96W–62L career · 36 lines in 2025
not enough data
Guadalupe Castillo
96W–65L career · 19 lines in 2025
not enough data
Isela Rayon
57W–46L career · 24 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kerry Lore
83W–74L career · 42 lines in 2025
not enough data
Margaret Baeza
23W–26L career · 20 lines in 2025
not enough data
Maria del Carmen Ledezma
22W–47L career · 23 lines in 2025
not enough data
Monica Morga
70W–72L career · 24 lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Arreola
45W–59L career · 23 lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Dalbin
99W–72L career · 35 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sara Blanco
48W–69L career · 31 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ursula Morawietz
40W–27L career · 14 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.