Teams

EW-CBRC-Sath

2026 Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 MEN

10 players · average NTRP 2.90 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-02-22vs YTC-Lob & Pony ShowSplit 11
L#1 DoublesNaudys Borrero / Pablo Maldonado vs Donovan Jedel / Seth Robins2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesGughan Sathyaseelan / Nate Pak vs Mike Christianson / Fred Wells6-2, 6-3
2026-02-21vs EW-PC-KhounnalaWon 21
W#1 DoublesAlex Alvarado / Ivan Cortez vs Rick Moser / Brian Wurdeman3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesGavin Albritton vs Nathan Burt5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesScot Hymas / Pablo Maldonado vs Rogelio Espinoza / Christopher Ramirez6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2026-02-20vs EW-PC-KhounnalaWon 30
W#1 DoublesLuis Cruz / Naudys Borrero vs Rogelio Espinoza / Chris Denney6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesGavin Albritton vs Nathan Burt6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesScot Hymas / Ivan Cortez vs Brian Wurdeman / Christopher Ramirez6-3, 6-4
2026-02-20vs YTC-Lob & Pony ShowWon 30
W#1 DoublesLuis Cruz / Alex Alvarado vs Fred Wells / Seth Robins6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesGavin Albritton vs Jake Bradshaw6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesGughan Sathyaseelan / Nate Pak vs Mike Christianson / Phillip Romer6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.35 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Jason Chapman
published 4.5
2.45
Luis Cruz
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.37
Gughan Sathyaseelan
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
2.34
Gavin Albritton
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 2.5
2.29
Nate Pak
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.28
Scot Hymas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Alex Alvarado
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Ivan Cortez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Naudys Borrero
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Pablo Maldonado
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nate Pak + Gughan Sathyaseelan3441% games−6.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jason Chapman
52W–38L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Luis Cruz
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%64%36%
2.45
2.5
Gughan Sathyaseelan
3W–8L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
0%84%16%
2.37
2.5
Gavin Albritton
2W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%89%11%
2.34
Nate Pak
3W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.29
Scot Hymas
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.28
2.5
Alex Alvarado
2W–0L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Ivan Cortez
2W–0L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Naudys Borrero
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Pablo Maldonado
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.