Teams

ICWaychoff

2022 Capital Summer 18 & Over Tri-Level · 2.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-08-04vs KSuttonWon 10
W#3 DoublesLaurie Holderness / Elizabeth Rupert vs Jessica Jones / Sarah Cooke6-1, 6-3
2022-08-01vs MJCramerWon 10
W#3 DoublesLaurie Holderness / Elizabeth Rupert vs Emily Boyer / Kathryn Shields6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2022-07-24vs KLamb TriLost 01
L#3 DoublesLisa Boneham / Laurie Holderness vs Gabrielle Bohdel / Natalie Rodriguez4-6, 0-6
2022-07-14vs JSolomonWon 10
W#3 DoublesLaurie Holderness / Grace Poole vs Christy van Ness / Jenny Sweet6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2022-06-12vs KLamb TriLost 01
L#3 DoublesLaurie Holderness / Grace Poole vs Gabrielle Bohdel / Natalie Rodriguez1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Amanda Campbell
published 3.5
3.25
Elizabeth Rupert
published 3
3.13
Kaitlin Johnston
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.99
Katie Warren
published
2.79
Christine Waychoff
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.78
Cristine Allison
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.75
Melissa Cleary
published
2.74
Monica Gardner
published
2.68
Lisa Dooley
published
2.62
Laurie Holderness
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.27
Grace Poole
published 2.5
2.14
Darsan Russo
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katie Warren + Elizabeth Rupert3255% gamesnot enough data
Cristine Allison + Kaitlin Johnston123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amanda Campbell
16W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.42
3
Elizabeth Rupert
23W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%3%97%
3.25
3.5
Kaitlin Johnston
45W–66L career · 8 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13
Katie Warren
12W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Christine Waychoff
74W–79L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.79
3
Cristine Allison
62W–127L career · 7 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.78
Melissa Cleary
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
Monica Gardner
11W–8L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
Lisa Dooley
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Laurie Holderness
79W–109L career · 5 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
2.62
2.5
Grace Poole
12W–8L career · no lines in 2022
0%96%4%
2.27
2.5
Darsan Russo
69W–104L career · 7 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.