Teams

Keswick

2021 Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over Women · Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over Women 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.17 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-06-13vs SweetspotsWon 10
W#1 DoublesJanie Shrader / Bridget Atwell vs Judith Divita / Pamela Jupin7-6, 6-2
2021-05-27vs ACACLost 01
L#3 DoublesDebbie Lonnquest / Martha Donnelly vs Kelly Lindauer / Amy Webb1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-05-20vs Forest LakesLost 01
L#2 DoublesMonna Fisher / Debbie Lonnquest vs Noel Jorgensen / Mary Beth Cancienne1-6, 1-6
2021-05-18vs BHSC - BlankenshipLost 01
L#2 DoublesBridget Atwell / Janet Silvester vs Kelly Trout / Alexis Ryan1-6, 2-6
2021-05-06vs SweetspotsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJanie Shrader / Bridget Atwell vs Andrea Seese / Elizabeth Gunnels6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDebbie Lonnquest / Monna Fisher vs Jessica Hamilton / Jane Fletcher6-7, 4-6
2021-04-22vs BHSC - BlankenshipWon 10
W#1 DoublesJanie Shrader / Bridget Atwell vs Alyson Maupin / Laura Futty6-3, 6-0
2021-04-15vs Forest LakesLost 02
L#1 SinglesBridget Atwell vs Tammy Hertel4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDebbie Lonnquest / Judie Schrecker vs Jenny Furlow / Lauren Suggs1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bridget Atwell
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.10
Melissa Zeller
usually #1 Singles 73%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.96
Debbie Lonnquest
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.85
Anais Gupton
published 3
2.53
Susan Cabell Mains
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.42
Janet Silvester
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Janie Shrader
published
Martha Donnelly
published
Tia Schurecht
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janet Silvester + Susan Cabell Mains3537% gamesnot enough data
Bridget Atwell + Melissa Zeller134 matchesnot enough data
Susan Cabell Mains + Melissa Zeller224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bridget Atwell
44W–51L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Melissa Zeller
121W–104L career · 15 lines in 2021
21%78%<1%
3.10
3
Debbie Lonnquest
42W–31L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%63%37%
2.96
3
Anais Gupton
2W–1L career · no lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Susan Cabell Mains
61W–85L career · type A · 12 lines in 2021
41%59%<1%
2.53
3
Janet Silvester
30W–68L career · 9 lines in 2021
74%26%<1%
2.42
Janie Shrader
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Martha Donnelly
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Tia Schurecht
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.