Teams

Quintana/Cereo

2021 18&Over Women · 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-07-12vs RadoffLost 03
L#1 DoublesTina Nabinger / Elaine Quintana vs Regina Black / Mindy Turner6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAnastasia Mello vs Helen MacDonald0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Berger / Sandy Sulik vs Marylou Watson / Anocha Walsh0-6, 1-6
2021-07-07vs RadoffWon 20
W#2 DoublesAnastasia Mello / Elaine Quintana vs Gwenn Judge / Marylou Watson7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesFran Ferguson / Mary-Ellen Cereo vs Mindy Turner / Elisabeth Moughty6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2021-07-05vs LeuenbergerLost 13
L#1 DoublesFran Ferguson / Mary-Ellen Cereo vs Ann Leuenberger / Elizabeth McNany3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesAnastasia Mello vs Stephanie Thompson4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTina Nabinger / Susan Berger vs Kate Grimm / Sarah Elliott0-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesElaine Quintana / Jana Kasik vs Shirley Yablonski / Johanna Kmetz3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-06-14vs LeuenbergerLost 04
L#1 DoublesJana Kasik / Mary-Ellen Cereo vs Charlotte Dieroff / Sarah Elliott4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTina Nabinger / Elaine Quintana vs Mary Dickson / Kate Grimm4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesAnastasia Mello vs Joyce Zhao6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSandy Sulik / Susan Berger vs Ann Leuenberger / Johanna Kmetz3-6, 2-6
2021-05-24vs LeuenbergerLost 13
L#1 DoublesAnastasia Mello / Sally Pearson vs Kate Grimm / Charlotte Dieroff0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesTina Nabinger vs Stephanie Thompson0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesFran Ferguson / Jana Kasik vs Elizabeth McNany / Sarah Elliott7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKristen Benson / Margaret Webster vs Ann Leuenberger / Shirley Yablonski2-6, 3-6
2021-05-10vs RadoffWon 21
L#1 DoublesTina Nabinger / Fran Ferguson vs Anocha Walsh / Marla Share2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesMary-Ellen Cereo / Sally Pearson vs Cynthia Vulcano / Jennifer Funiciello6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJana Kasik / Elaine Quintana vs Susan Greetham / Mindy Turner6-2, 6-2
2021-05-03vs LeuenbergerLost 03
L#1 DoublesSally Pearson / Tina Nabinger vs Kate Grimm / Charlotte Dieroff1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKristen Benson / Susan Berger vs Ann Leuenberger / Heather Marrin1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesElaine Quintana / Mary-Ellen Cereo vs Stephanie Thompson / Shirley Yablonski2-6, 1-6
2021-04-26vs RadoffLost 03
L#1 DoublesTina Nabinger / Fran Ferguson vs Anocha Walsh / Marla Share1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMary-Ellen Cereo / Sally Pearson vs Jennifer Funiciello / Cynthia Vulcano7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKristen Benson / Margaret Webster vs Lori Kunz / Nancy Radoff2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Leuenberger8033717260
2Quintana/Cereo0873370453

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Young Jensen
published
3.24
Susan Berger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.15
Anastasia Mello
usually #3 Doubles 29%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3.5
Elaine Quintana
published
Fran Ferguson
published
Jana Kasik
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Margaret Webster
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mary-Ellen Cereo
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sally Pearson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Sandy Sulik
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tina Nabinger
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tina Nabinger + Jana Kasik3446% games−0.6% vs expected
Jana Kasik + Mary-Ellen Cereo134 matchesnot enough data
Tina Nabinger + Mary-Ellen Cereo033 matchesnot enough data
Tina Nabinger + Susan Berger033 matchesnot enough data
Jana Kasik + Sandy Sulik033 matchesnot enough data
Anastasia Mello + Sandy Sulik303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Young Jensen
10W–6L career · no lines in 2021
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Susan Berger
95W–83L career · 4 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Anastasia Mello
28W–30L career · 6 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.15
Elaine Quintana
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Fran Ferguson
2W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Jana Kasik
18W–33L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Margaret Webster
25W–29L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Mary-Ellen Cereo
28W–39L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Sally Pearson
18W–37L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Sandy Sulik
19W–38L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Tina Nabinger
24W–71L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.